ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2054|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-7-14 再讨论

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-9 07:02:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-7-14 再讨论

Certain politicians in the country of Birangi argue that a 50 percent tax on new automobiles would halt the rapid increase of automobiles on Birangi’s roads and thereby slow the deterioration of Birangi’s air quality.  Although most experts agree that such a tax would result in fewer Birangians buying new vehicles and gradually reduce the number of automobiles on Birangi’s roads, they contend that it would have little impact on Birangi’s air-quality problem.



Which of the following, if true in Birangi, would most strongly support the experts’ contention about the effect of the proposed automobile tax on Birangi’s air-quality problem?




  1. Automobile emissions are the largest single source of air pollution.

  2. Some of the proceeds from the new tax would go toward expanding the nonpolluting commuter rail system.

  3. Currently, the sales tax on new automobiles is considerably lower than 50 percent.

  4. Automobiles become less fuel efficient and therefore contribute more to air pollution as they age.

  5. The scrapping of automobiles causes insignificant amounts of air pollution.

这道题以前被讨论过,但是没有达成共识。


D or E? I think it should be E because "scrapping" means "exhaust (尾气)"。 选D需要make 太多的assumptions.


沙发
发表于 2005-8-9 09:23:00 | 只看该作者

我支持选E;理由不多说了。

板凳
发表于 2005-8-9 14:17:00 | 只看该作者

答案应该是D. E怎可能对?


The scrapping of automobiles causes insignificant amounts of air pollution.


请注意insignificant .


地板
发表于 2005-8-9 14:46:00 | 只看该作者

楼上的反了,正因为减车不增加污染,才加强专家们的观-----减车没用。


to楼主d削弱

5#
发表于 2007-11-15 20:05:00 | 只看该作者
6#
发表于 2007-11-15 20:06:00 | 只看该作者

答案怎么饿是D啊

真是害人啊?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-4 10:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部