AA119,请教大家

countd

AA119. The following is from an editorial that appeared in a laceType>RiverlaceType> laceType>CitylaceType> newspaper.

“The Clio Development Group wants to build a multilevel parking garage on Dock Street in laceType>RiverlaceType> laceType>CitylaceType>, but the plan should not be approved. Most of the buildings on the block would then have to be demolished. Because these buildings were erected decades ago, they have historic significance and must therefore be preserved as economic assets in the effort to revitalize a restored riverfront area. Recall how Lakesburg has benefited from business increases in its historic downtown center. Moreover, there is plenty of vacant land for a parking lot elsewhere in laceType>RiverlaceType> City.”

请教大家,我题目没看明白

conclusion到底是什么啊?

building有没被摧毁啊?一会说摧毁,一会说保留?

写作思路是什么啊??

谢谢

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-3 21:27:13编辑过]

happyfish0517

119.给River城的报纸的编辑的一封信：

Clio发展商不应该被允许在Dock街修建多层停车场，因为这个街区的大多数建筑将被摧毁。因为这些建筑是几十年前修建的，他们具有历史意义，因此应该在复兴沿河区域的努力中被保留做经济资产。回忆一下沿湖地区通过他们的有历史的中心街区的商业增长得到了多少好处。而且，River城的其他地方有足够多空地可以修停车场。

文章反对摧毁古建筑来修建停车场。

所以你应该说那些建筑没有什么历史意义，不一定会带来商业增长。RIVER城其它地方并没有空地，就只有DOCK街需要停车场其它地方远水解不了近渴，我们还可以通过其它方法避免摧毁建筑而又可以在DOCK街修建多层停车场

等等等等...

happyfish0517

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=26&ID=776&replyID=&skin=0

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=26&ID=19616&replyID=&skin=0

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=26&ID=19609&replyID=&skin=0

看下~~CD上有翻译题目的...虽然有些题目不是完全准确~~但至少可以做个参考

考前最好浏览一遍~防止到时候碰到看不懂的题...

A ZA A ZA FIGHTING...

xjlv128

以下是引用happyfish0517在2005-8-3 22:53:00的发言：

所以你应该说那些建筑没有什么历史意义，不一定会带来商业增长。RIVER城其它地方并没有空地，就只有DOCK街需要停车场其它地方远水解不了近渴，我们还可以通过其它方法避免摧毁建筑而又可以在DOCK街修建多层停车场

等等等等...

斑斑，你看这句话是什么错误呢？causal oversimplification,还是gratuitous assumption???我这两个分不清。而且，现在总觉得每篇里面都是assumption的问题，一找可以找很多，其他survey, sample倒很有限。写的时候会不会显得角度过于狭隘？

 Because these buildings were erected decades ago, they have historic significance and must therefore be preserved as economic assets in the effort to revitalize a restored riverfront area

cool_pl

请问这篇AA中有没有包含一个错误类比？

将沿湖区和沿河区域错误的类比，认为沿湖区域由于有历史的中心街区而获得商业的曾长而认为误认为沿河区域如果保留建筑也会获得商业的增长？

请指教～