- UID
- 1167873
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-10-27
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
">Neuroscientist: Memory evolved to help animals react appropriately to situations
they encounter by drawing on the past experience of similar situations. But this
does not require that animals perfectly recall every detail of all their experiences.
Instead, to function well, memory should generalize from past experiences that are
similar to the current one.
Th
e neuroscientist’s statements, if true, most strongly support which of the
fo
llowing conclusions?
(A) At least some animals perfectly recall every detail of at least some past
experiences.
(B) Perfectly recalling every detail of all their past experiences could help at
least some animals react more appropriately than they otherwise would to
new situations they encounter.
(C) Generalizing from past experiences requires clear memories of most if
not all the details of those experiences.
(D) Recalling every detail of all past experiences would be incompatible with
any ability to generalize from those experiences.
(E) Animals can often react more appropriately than they otherwise would
to situations they encounter if they draw on generalizations from past
experiences of similar situations.
这是OG的第一题,稍微有点疑问的就是B选项,我地理解为,完美的回忆起细节才对一些动物有帮助,所以B选项否认了概括的记忆对动物也有帮助。不知道这样理解是否正确。
第二个疑问就是语法问题!!!求大神解救,E选项怎么会出现“would to situation”这样的结构,没见过啊!!!求普及
|
|