求问此题A为何错了，A看起来也蛮合理的啊，求大神解答

Bensontuo

Spot the question type: method of reasoning + weaken

Structure of the reasoning:

J: Cause: Videorama  Effect: 10000 fewer videos in 1994 than in 1993

B: Weaken the causation by attempting to dismiss the cause.

Ok, what are we going to do ? weaken the attempt of dismissing the cause as the objection to the causation.

So, either the attempt is invalid or the other explain does not dismiss the original cause.

A. Who to say the exact amount of rental and solds ? How could that be even relevant.

B. Apparently out of the scope, why are we discussing the other 2 stores from which only rent by do not sell ?
If that is true, then we are undermining J but not B

C. 你還需要分析這個選項嗎？  要不要你選了再告訴我為什麼你會選Ｃ？

D. if you choose this answer, you must be assuming that people would only either rent or buy, and if they buy, it must be true that they often buy the movies they watched. So, if they do not often buy the movies they watch, they must rent the movies.

原文有這樣的條件嗎？  不要自行假設

E. 賣四千卷, 這四千卷可以被流傳廣泛地借幾次？ 如果有可能平均借超過三次 per movie, 那videorama 開幕就有可能是這一萬卷錄影帶出租減少的原因了。

Estella1997

可以问一个关于E新的问题嘛？只是说有碟的人喜欢把碟借给朋友 如何知道这些有碟的人都是从Videorama借的呢？假如不是从Videorama借的不就加强了观点吗？