ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 携隐
打印 上一主题 下一主题

最新出炉:Lawyer的OG10题型分类

[精华] [复制链接]
41#
发表于 2005-9-29 20:10:00 | 只看该作者

请问30题为什么归为support呢?


30. The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called “historical costing.” Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year’s contractual price.



Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts?


A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.


B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.


C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.


D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.


E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.

42#
发表于 2005-10-6 08:59:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用foreinter在2005-9-13 10:25:00的发言:

两个问题:

1. 象104 和122这两题的提问涉及到unless句型,也应该归为assumption吗?请解释一下


2. 123题我觉得是Must be true题型,怎么是assumption 呢?


本人愚笨,请NN指教



不是NN, 试解:

1. not A unless B 表达为: A-->B, B为必要条件(assumption). 通常情况下我们所说的assumption都是必要型假设. 当然也有充分性假设(justify the conclusion). 具体见lawyer的实战方法篇, 真的很经典.

2. 个人也偏向这题是Infer/Must be true题. 只是这题有点特殊.

我们先看正确选项C: MegaCorp's goal is possible to meet only if continuing advances in product quality are possible. "only if"必要性指示词, 所以该选项的充分必要关系为: goal is possible-->advances in product quality are possible.

所以单单在选项中, 我们看出advances in product quality are possible是goal is possible的必要条件, 即是假设.

我们再来看全文, 全文的推理过程是: 顾客期望高质量, 且一旦满足了顾客的期望, 顾客又有更进一步的要求. 所以要满足顾客的需要只有进一步提高质量. 而这个结论正是选项C这个命题所能表达的. 所以从根本上说, 两者不存在矛盾.

不过"分类要看问题如何问", 我还是偏向这题是Must be true, 只是这道题的答案刚好是个假设命题.

个人理解, 大家讨论!  


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-6 9:14:13编辑过]
43#
发表于 2005-10-6 09:20:00 | 只看该作者
30题关键在于对问题的理解: 这里是basis for economically sound pricing method, 而不是basis for historical costing. 注意对criticism的理解.
44#
发表于 2005-10-7 19:13:00 | 只看该作者

顶!急我之所急!

45#
发表于 2005-11-17 14:33:00 | 只看该作者
up
46#
发表于 2005-12-15 19:45:00 | 只看该作者

thank you very much

47#
发表于 2006-1-2 17:06:00 | 只看该作者

謝謝!真是好東西!



48#
发表于 2006-1-5 13:22:00 | 只看该作者


49#
发表于 2006-1-11 02:06:00 | 只看该作者

Thank you so much! Ding....

50#
发表于 2006-2-1 05:13:00 | 只看该作者

thanks man

thanks man i appreciate it
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 13:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部