以下是引用vanessav在2006-6-25 3:12:00的发言:我同意 楼上的说法。我也觉得 应该是B 我的答案是 25 C 27 B View of Author: I t is possible for a particular government policy to continue to have an impact after that policy has been eliminated the view of the scholars and politicians mentioned : discount the role of public policy and emphasize the role Line of the labor market when explaining (5) employers’ maternity-leave policies, arguing that prior to the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) 文章的重点说的是公共政策有关在 public policy对 maternity leave act的影响上不同的意见。EEOC的ruling就是一项public policy 既然25 都选了C了 It is possible for a particular government policy to continue to have an impact after that policy has been eliminated. 更加说明focus在 a particular government policy 上面,所以至于employers 的动机是怎么样,也不管了。 The answer should be 25.C 26.D 26.B: They agree that the EEOC ruling on maternity-leave policy had an initial impact on employers’ creation of maternity-leave programs but disagree over whether the Supreme Court’s striking down of the EEOC ruling weakened that impact. The red part points out the error in B because the passage has claimed that these scholars argue that: prior to the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993, employers were already providing maternity leave in response to the increase in the number of women workers.
which means these scholars do not agree with the effects of EEOC.
Thus the answer should be D. prior to the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993, employers were already providing maternity leave in response to the increase in the number of women workers.
which means these scholars do not agree with the effects of EEOC.
Thus the answer should be D. |