ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2415|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[大全98][完全不懂]

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-30 22:34:00 | 只看该作者

[大全98][完全不懂]

Passage 98 (13/15)


In reaction to a rigid, overrefined classical curriculum, some educational philosophers have swung sharply to an espousal of “life experience” as the sole source of learning. Using their narrow interpretation of John Dewey’s theories for support and spouting (to speak or utter in a pompous or oratorical manner: DECLAIM) such phrases as “Teach the child, not the subject,” they demand an end to rigorous study and insist that only through doing can learning take place. While not all adherents to this philosophy would totally eliminate the study of great books, the gradual subordination of literature in the school curriculum reflects their influence.


What is the purpose of literature? Why read if life alone is to be our teacher? James Joyce tells us that the artist reveals the human condition by re-creating life out of life; Aristotle, that art presents universal truths because its form is taken from nature. Thus, consciously or otherwise, great writers extend our understanding of ourselves and our world. We can soar with them to the heights of aspiration or plummet with them to the depths of despair. How much wider is the understanding we gain from reading than from viewing life through the keyhole of our individual experience.


This function of literature, the enlarging of our life sphere, is of major importance in itself. Additionally, however, literature suggests solutions to social problems. The overweening ambitions of political leaders—and their sneering contempt for the law—did not appear for the first time in the writings of Bernstein and Woodward. The problems and behavior of the guilt-ridden did not await the appearance of the bearded psychoanalysts of the nineteenth century.


Federal Judge Learned Hand wrote, “I venture to believe that it is as important to a judge called upon to pass on a question of constitutional law, to have at least a bowing acquaintance (bowing acquaintance: n.点头之交,泛泛之交) with Thucydides, Gibbon, and Carlyle, with Homer, Dante, Shakespeare, and Milton, with Montaigne and Rabelais, with Plato, Bacon, Hume, and Kant, as with the books which have been specifically written on the subject. For in such matters everything turns upon the spirit in which he approaches the questions before him.”


How do we overcome our dissenter? We must start with the field of agreement: the belief that education should serve to improve the individual and society. We must persuade our dissenters that the voices of human experience stretch our human faculties and open us to learning. We must convince them of the unity of life and art. We must prove to them that far from being separate, literature is that part of life that illumines life.



5.     Which of the following best describes the organization of the third paragraph of the passage?


(A) An idea is reiterated, a new idea is introduced, and two supporting examples are given.


(B) The preceding paragraph is summarized and conclusions are drawn.


(C) A new idea is introduced, the idea is qualified, and the implications of the idea are analyzed.


(D) The main idea of the preceding paragraph is restated, and evidence is given to support it.A


(E) Two functions of literature are identified, and an example of each is given.


A和D有啥区别阿?搞8懂哎!



8.     The passage supplies information to suggest that the author and the educational philosophers mentioned in the first paragraph would agree that


      


(A) learning is the key to adaptability in an ever-changing environment


(B) the traditional classroom should be transformed into a learning laboratory


(C) the purpose of education is to improve society as well as the individual


(D) one must know history in order to understand the present and the future


(E) the primary aim of education is the transmission of culture


(C)


这道题怎么定位得出啊?找不到答案!



9.     It can be inferred from the passage that the author makes which of the following assumptions about his readers?


(A) They believe that schools should reflect society.


(B) They believe that the subject, not the child, should be taught.


(C) They favor a return to the classical curriculum.


(D) They share his view that the study of great books is essential to education.


(E) They believe that only through reading can learning take place. (D)


不过真的不从字里行间分析,真的做不出。



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-30 22:36:10编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-10-14 23:18:00 | 只看该作者

第5题,a new idea is introduced这是区别所在.文章中有Additionally, however, literature suggests solutions to social problems.

板凳
发表于 2008-10-14 23:21:00 | 只看该作者
第八题, 我也错了.不过我现在知道了The passage supplies information to suggest that the author and the educational philosophers mentioned in the first paragraph would agree that题中虽然提到the first paragraph. 但实际是在最后一段 We must start with the field of agreement: the belief that education should serve to improve the individual and society.这就是他们的共同处
地板
发表于 2008-10-14 23:24:00 | 只看该作者
第9题.因为作者一直在用we说明他假设他和读者是站在同一立场的.读者是同意他的观点
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-26 22:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部