- UID
- 934502
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-9-8
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
35 购买不动产 的一篇考古
The following appeared in a letter from a part-owner of a small retail clothing chain to her business partner:
“Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious, then, that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So, it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in our financial interest to purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights.”
1. Gratuitous assumption:
(the real estate price in Sadida Heights have been ring while then prices in Palm Grove have remained unchanged in not sufficient to reach the conclusion that a retail space in Sandida Heights is not much more expensive than a similar in Plam Grove )
2) 错误因果关系
( more expensive, caused the retail spaces are now overpriced)也许因为P城是 underpriced 呢?
3) Gratuitous assumption:
因为价格低, 所以买P 城, 这个也许不是个好主意, 其他竞争对手也有同样的想法, P城的竞争压力大。
|
|