大全352，每人问过，结构有点迷糊

cher6068

15.   In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday, believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.

(A) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was

(B) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation instead of a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was

(C) believing that it was not a temporary expedient but a seeming permanent accommodation to what many observers thought of as a

(D) not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was（D）

(E) not as a temporary expedient but believing it a seemingly permanent accommodation for what many observers thought

我不明白D中what many observers thouth was...为什么thout was连用，是不是有什么结构我没划分清楚，请大N们指点：）

cher6068

up!请NN们有空时帮忙分析一下吧，谢了

joe11

D. not as a expedient but as a accommodation to economy

  what many observers thought was 的主语是 what 所以和 was 连用，整体修饰 economy

cher6068

...industries put into effect a six-hour workday, not as...but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.

joe11：

我认为what 引导的主语从句是做 accommodation to 的介词宾语，可是为什么在这个从句中要有两个动词 thought 和 was 呢？能不能把这句话的中文意思帮忙翻译一下？

[em06

yukon

In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday,not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.

1922年，橡胶、服装、造船行业致力于推行每天6小时工作至，这并非临时的权宜之计，而更像是对许多观察家认为的技术导致生产过剩的一种长期调整。

bigbeard

以下是引用cher6068在2005-6-20 11:20:00的发言：

...industries put into effect a six-hour workday, not as...but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.

joe11：

我认为what 引导的主语从句是做 accommodation to 的介词宾语，可是为什么在这个从句中要有两个动词 thought 和 was 呢？能不能把这句话的中文意思帮忙翻译一下？

[em06

我的理解是：many observers thought是一个插入语，what was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology是一个完整的主语从句。不知道对不对？

中文意思倒是明白，不过，感觉总是奇奇怪怪的。但别的选项错误更明显。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-20 17:20:06编辑过]

yukon

其实我刚才翻译完后就有点后悔了，自己翻译得太烂

zx_nju

我也认为是插入语

nuj_am

插入语，不错，例what do you think he can do after the failure?

do you think不就是一种很常用的插入语吗？？