ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3812|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道真题,大家看看答案该选什麽?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-12 14:15:00 | 只看该作者

一道真题,大家看看答案该选什麽?

一道真题,大家看看答案该选什莫?如果答案是B的话,D为何不对?



In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.



A)       chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week


B)       chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week


C)       chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997


D)       chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997


E)       chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

沙发
发表于 2005-6-12 14:41:00 | 只看该作者

B里面的过去完成时用的没有道理; A中they没有指代对像; C的被动语态awkward; E的that引出的结构混乱.


综上所述, 我认为, D.

板凳
发表于 2005-6-12 14:43:00 | 只看该作者

我也觉得B 最好


D “,"后 指过去分词短语,应该作状语,其逻辑主语应该是句子主语, children--显然 不行,因为不是 孩子在比 是数字比。


继续讨论

地板
发表于 2005-6-12 15:09:00 | 只看该作者
没有看到分号, 楼上说的对! 同意B.
5#
发表于 2005-6-12 15:30:00 | 只看该作者

Why not A? "Children spent N hours a week” in the first half of the sentence is parallel with “they had spent six hours a week” in answer A, thus, “they” can easily refer to children. In addition, “hours” or “chores” cannot possibly spend hours, therefore, children is the only logical choice. Although the past perfect tense in A is controversial, the next best choice, B, also uses past perfect.

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-12 15:35:00 | 只看该作者

明白了,是 “children" and  "compared with" 说不上话!


太好了,把我解脱了,之前苦想了好久,快憋死了!

7#
发表于 2005-6-12 15:44:00 | 只看该作者

The more I looked at it, the more compelling answer C is. It uses simple past for verb tense and “whereas” for conjunction word. The only flaw is the passive mode. However, it alone cannot constitute an incorrect answer.



I am a newbie

见笑了
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-12 15:55:00 | 只看该作者

楼上,不能拿“children" 和 compare with 后的 "a figure" 放一起, 逻辑意思不配!

9#
发表于 2005-6-16 16:18:00 | 只看该作者
谁来说说A的不足?
10#
发表于 2005-6-16 17:13:00 | 只看该作者

I support A.


In B, that figure is strange. I see "the figure", seldom see"that figure" 应该有区别的。只是我也说不清楚。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 02:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部