1. People who accuse the postal service of incompetence and inefficiency while complaining of the proposed five-cent increase in postal rates do not know a bargain when they see one. Few experiences are more enjoyable than reading a personal letter from a friend. Viewed in this way, postal service is so underpriced that a five-cent increase is unworthy of serious debate.> >>>
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument> >
(A) suggests that the postal service is both competent and efficient, but does not establish how competence and efficiency should be measured> >
(B) claims that the proposed increase is insignificant but does not say at what level the increase would be worthy of serious debate> >
(C) confuses the value of the object delivered with the value of delivering that object
(D) appeals to an outside authority for support of a premise that should be established by argument
(E) fails to establish whether or not the critics of the postal service are employees of the postal service
这个题目选C,我就没明白,谢谢NN给解释一下. |