ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1787|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT 10_4-1

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-8 21:08:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT 10_4-1

1. People who accuse the postal service of incompetence and inefficiency while complaining of the proposed five-cent increase in postal rates do not know a bargain when they see one. Few experiences are more enjoyable than reading a personal letter from a friend. Viewed in this way, postal service is so underpriced that a five-cent increase is unworthy of serious debate.> >>>


The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument> >


(A) suggests that the postal service is both competent and efficient, but does not establish how competence and efficiency should be measured> >


(B) claims that the proposed increase is insignificant but does not say at what level the increase would be worthy of serious debate> >


(C) confuses the value of the object delivered with the value of delivering that object


(D) appeals to an outside authority for support of a premise that should be established by argument


(E) fails to establish whether or not the critics of the postal service are employees of the postal service


这个题目选C,我就没明白,谢谢NN给解释一下.

沙发
发表于 2005-6-9 09:54:00 | 只看该作者

Value of the object delivered refers the value of the letter, reflected as "Few experiences are more enjoyable than reading a personal letter from a friend."


But value of delivering that object refers to the postage it will cost to have the letter delivered, which is a completely different topic from the value of the letter/object.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-9 19:49:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢,我明白.唉真是笨哦.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 22:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部