ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1272|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-6-11 好像没讨论过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-26 16:01:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-6-11 好像没讨论过

Q9 to Q12:



      The sloth bear, an insect-eating



       animal native to Nepal, exhibits only one


       behavior that is truly distinct from that of


Line       other bear species:  the females carry


  (5)       their cubs (at least part-time) until the


cubs are about nine months old, even


though the cubs can walk on their own


at six months.  Cub-carrying also occurs


among some other myrmecophagous


(10)      (ant-eating) mammals; therefore, one


explanation is that cub-carrying is


necessitated by myrmecophagy, since


myrmecophagy entails a low metabolic


rate and high energy expenditure in


(15)      walking between food patches.  How-



ever, although polar bears’ locomotion


is similarly inefficient, polar bear cubs


walk along with their mother.  Further-


more, the daily movements of sloth


(20)      bears and American black bears—


       which are similar in size to sloth bears


       and have similar-sized home ranges


reveal similar travel rates and distances,


suggesting that if black bear cubs are


(25)      able to keep up with their mother, so


too should sloth bear cubs.


      An alternative explanation is defense



from predation. Black bear cubs use


trees for defense, whereas brown bears


(30)      and polar bears, which regularly inhabit


treeless environments, rely on aggres-


sion to protect their cubs.  Like brown



       bears and polar bears (and unlike other



myrmecophagous mammals, which are



(35)     noted for their passivity), sloth bears



are easily provoked to aggression.


Sloth bears also have relatively large


canine teeth, which appear to be more


functional for fighting than for foraging.


(40)     Like brown bears and polar bears,


sloth bears may have evolved in an


environment with few trees.  They are


especially attracted to food-rich


grasslands; although few grasslands


(45)      persist today on the Indian subcontinent,


this type of habitat was once wide-


spread there.  Grasslands support


high densities of tigers, which fight and


sometimes kill sloth bears; sloth bears


(50)      also coexist with and have been killed


by tree-climbing leopards, and are often


confronted and chased by rhinoceroses


and elephants, which can topple trees.


Collectively these factors probably



(55)      selected against tree-climbing as a



defensive strategy for sloth bear cubs


Because sloth bears are smaller than


brown and polar bears and are under


greater threat from dangerous animals,


(60)      they may have adopted the extra pre-


caution of carrying their cubs.  Although


cub-carrying may also be adoptive for


myrmecophagous foraging, the behavior


of sloth bear cubs, which climb on their


(65)      mother’s back at the first sign of danger,


suggests that predation was a key


stimulus.


Q11:


Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s argument in lines 18-26 (“Furthermore … sloth bear cubs”)?


              



  1. Cub-carrying behavior has been observed in many non-myrmecophagous mammals.

  2. Many of the largest myrmecophagous mammals do not typically exhibit cub-carrying behavior.

  3. Some sloth bears have home ranges that are smaller in size than the average home ranges of black bears.

  4. The locomotion of black bears is significantly more efficient than the locomotion of sloth bears.

  5. The habitat of black bears consists of terrain that is significantly more varied than that of the habitat of sloth bears.

为什么这道题的答案不是C,而是D呢?locomotion 是说polar bear和sloth bear 的比较啊!而C在原文可以找到啊!


这道题没人讨论过,是不是太简单了,偶晕了,请指教!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-26 16:06:18编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-26 16:52:00 | 只看该作者

没人理?是不是太简单了,大家都懒得说啊,可我怎么就是想不通呢?

板凳
发表于 2009-2-20 16:58:00 | 只看该作者

原文说两者身体大小类似、活动范围和距离类似,因此黑熊可以自己走,小树懒也应该可以。

C 是support原来的结论了,如果C成立,home range(活动范围)更小的话,那小树懒就更应该可以自己走路了。

E:黑熊的栖息地地形比树懒的更具有多样化。

栖息地地形的比较。

因为原文讲的是为什么不能自己走,而要背。黑熊的栖息地多样化,未必说行走起来就很容易,也许都是不好走的路呢,那就是SUPPORT了。除非说黑熊栖息地比树懒的更容易行走,就是WEAKEN。(请NN指正)

D。The locomotion of black bears is significantly more efficient than the locomotion of sloth bears.

原文推理:身材、活动类似——>能力类似(能够自己走)。

D 比较的是某个能力成立的条件。他因削弱。

黑熊移动更有效率,那就是说单位时间内消耗的能量少,比树懒更有优势。因此黑熊能做到的,小树懒未必能够做到。 

地板
发表于 2009-7-21 22:05:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-8 13:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部