ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Joshua_zhao
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【洛基】717起罗技鸡精整理(共114题,更新:8/14-02:00)

[精华]   [复制链接]
101#
发表于 2015-8-4 04:08:21 | 只看该作者
THANK YOU VERY MUCH
102#
发表于 2015-8-4 04:58:16 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主分享~
103#
发表于 2015-8-4 09:14:24 | 只看该作者
楼主咋不更新了··
104#
发表于 2015-8-4 10:05:04 | 只看该作者
等待楼主更新 楼主加油 快快更新
105#
发表于 2015-8-4 13:26:08 | 只看该作者
莫非今天没换库?8.5考表示很恐惧
106#
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-4 13:28:38 | 只看该作者
xiaokong555 发表于 2015-8-4 10:05
等待楼主更新 楼主加油 快快更新

已更新~~~请查阅
107#
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-4 13:30:18 | 只看该作者
Mnnnn 发表于 2015-8-4 13:26
莫非今天没换库?8.5考表示很恐惧

没有换库!~~本月的寂静还可以看
108#
发表于 2015-8-4 13:35:06 | 只看该作者
Joshua_zhao 发表于 2015-8-4 13:30
没有换库!~~本月的寂静还可以看

~~~~好担心明天换库。。阅读太渣
谢谢楼主~
109#
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-4 14:03:55 | 只看该作者
Mnnnn 发表于 2015-8-4 13:35
~~~~好担心明天换库。。阅读太渣
谢谢楼主~

明天考的话也看下吧,出现频率高的寂静看下就好
110#
发表于 2015-8-4 14:38:22 | 只看该作者
Paleontologist: About 2.8 million years ago, many species that lived near the ocean floor suffered substantial population declines. These declines coincided with the onset of an ice age. The notion that cold killed those bottom-dwelling creatures outright is misguided, however; temperatures near the ocean floor would have changed very little. Nevertheless, the cold probably did cause the population declines, though indirectly. Many bottom-dwellers depended for food on plankton, small organisms that lived close to the surface and sank to the bottom when they died. Most probably, the plankton suffered a severe population decline as a result of sharply lower temperatures at the surface, depriving many bottom-dwellers of food.

In the paleontologist's reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
AThe first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a judgment offered in spelling out that hypothesis.  (correct)
BThe first introduces the hypothesis proposed by the paleontologist; the second is a position that the paleontologist opposes.  
CThe first is an explanation challenged by the paleontologist; the second is an explanation proposed by the paleontologist.  
DThe first is a judgment advanced in support of a conclusion reached by the paleontologist; the second is that conclusion.  
EThe first is a generalization put forward by the paleontologist; the second presents certain exceptional cases in which that generalization does not hold.
貌似找到了22的原题,prep 上的
然后感觉题目一样。但是选项好像不大对
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-28 22:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部