LSAT set5 section 1 No. 4

mindfree

greattaste,

You are right in that A-->B. What you misunderstood is the question. B is right. Based on the information from the passage we know that:

strong personalities take over work (C) --> not functional for public use (-A), and
A-->B

Then we can safely follow the logic that C-->(-B)-->(-A)

I think you have got the core of this problem. Just think over the quesiton.

BTW, did you get your ID from the Miller Light Beer?

greattaste

First thank you for your answer.

I finally get the point. I overlooked the sentence "Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. ", which indicate the reason for C --> -A is “not unobtrusive” .

So choice (B) must be right.

From your "BTW", can I follow logically the you lived/are living in the states? As for my ID, it is from Nescafe, not miller light.

以下是引用mindfree在2003-8-14 13:53:00的发言：
greattaste,

You are right in that A-->B. What you misunderstood is the question. B is right. Based on the information from the passage we know that:

strong personalities take over work (C) --> not functional for public use (-A), and
A-->B

Then we can safely follow the logic that C-->(-B)-->(-A)

I think you have got the core of this problem. Just think over the quesiton.

BTW, did you get your ID from the Miller Light Beer?

mindfree

You are right. I was amused by that commercial. I am not a coffee drinker so I missed the Nescafe one.