<DIV class=quote><B>以下是引用<I>insead</I>在2005-4-7 2:42:00的发言：</B><br /><br /><>LSE 在经济学尤其是政治经济学领域的成绩有目共睹。但目前好像在微观领域如Game Theory, 和Econometrics 方面没有大师。</P><br /><>对于的商科，其教育和研究质量和美国top10的学校还有不少差距。</P><br /><>当然，若论对中国的影响力，LSE应该超过大多数美国Top20的学校。</P><br /></DIV><br /><>LSE is the best school to study econometrics. Its econometrics research is only second to Yale in the world and is ahead of all other big name schools like Chicago or MIT. <p></p></P><br /><>The recent surge in Chinese student admittance could be attributed to the school's recognition of the rise of our great nation and its attempt to build a stronger connection with China through providing training ground for future Chinese leaders. Yes it is charging a hefty amount of money for its undergraduate and master courses but please remember money along won't bring you in. There are plenty well qualified students got turned away every year because the places here are limited. (There are so many people applying to some of its most competitive master courses that LSE is setting up additional hurdles for its own undergraduate student who want to continue studying here). <p></p></P><br /><>Rather than valuing a school based on your Chinese classmates' backgrounds, I guess it is fairer to look at where they end up after they graduate. LSE's econ PhD placement is in the same league with top 5 econ schools in US and its undergraduate & master programs are among the biggest suppliers of future bankers/consultants/lawyers to the City/Wall Street. The destination of its past students compares favourably to any of the top US institutions (not top 20 but top 5). I have come across several top American consulting firms which recruits heavily from LSE but don't even bother to go to Cornell or Berkeley to hold their graduate on-campus presentations...</P>
<DIV class=quote><B>以下是引用<i>Chiwar</i>在2005-4-8 5:51:00的发言：</B><br /><br /><>LSE is the best school to study econometrics. Its econometrics research is only second to Yale in the world and is ahead of all other big name schools like Chicago or MIT. <p></p></P><>The recent surge in Chinese student admittance could be attributed to the school's recognition of the rise of our great nation and its attempt to build a stronger connection with China through providing training ground for future Chinese leaders. Yes it is charging a hefty amount of money for its undergraduate and master courses but please remember money along won't bring you in. There are plenty well qualified students got turned away every year because the places here are limited. (There are so many people applying to some of its most competitive master courses that LSE is setting up additional hurdles for its own undergraduate student who want to continue studying here). <p></p></P><>Rather than valuing a school based on your Chinese classmates' backgrounds, I guess it is fairer to look at where they end up after they graduate. LSE's econ PhD placement is in the same league with top 5 econ schools in US and its undergraduate & master programs are among the biggest suppliers of future bankers/consultants/lawyers to the City/Wall Street. The destination of its past students compares favourably to any of the top US institutions (not top 20 but top 5). I have come across several top American consulting firms which recruits heavily from LSE but don't even bother to go to Cornell or Berkeley to hold their graduate on-campus presentations...</P></DIV><p>
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-4-7 19:08:00
>作为社会科学的毕业学生，本人一直对LSE具有特殊的感情，不管对于中国历史还是当前的国际格局，LSE发挥的思想库作用可能在全球范围只有HARVARD和YALE等能与之相提并论！</P><br /><
楼主
