ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: RexEva
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 第二篇 8

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-7-7 09:43:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wangyu73cn在2005-6-10 13:30:00的发言:
Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value.

是个祈使句吧。这里,从本段开头部分开始的意思:“你也许会提出异议......。而且,...。对此,我同意。的确,不应该卖那些具有独特的艺术和科学价值的文物。但是,你也许又提出,每件文物都有独特价值。在此,我们就有不同意见了。...”


思路如此清晰,羡慕ING。

12#
发表于 2005-7-28 15:07:00 | 只看该作者
同意
13#
发表于 2005-8-23 20:45:00 | 只看该作者
收获很多
14#
发表于 2005-8-31 14:39:00 | 只看该作者

我对第8题中的选项B还有些疑问


8. The author implies that all of the following statements about duplicate artifacts are true EXCEPT:




(A)   A market for such artifacts already exists


(B)   Such artifacts seldom have scientific value.




(C)   There is likely to be a continuing supply of such artifacts.




(D)  Museums are well supplied with examples of such artifacts.
(E)   Such artifacts frequently exceed in quality those already catalogued in museum collections


从文中,Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong.


可看出,并不是每个articraft都有potential scientific value,这如何可以推出Such artifacts seldom have scientific value.呢?


还请NN指点一二!!!



15#
发表于 2005-9-6 08:09:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用认认真真在2005-8-31 14:39:00的发言:

我对第8题中的选项B还有些疑问


8. The author implies that all of the following statements about duplicate artifacts are true EXCEPT:




(A)   A market for such artifacts already exists


(B)   Such artifacts seldom have scientific value.




(C)   There is likely to be a continuing supply of such artifacts.




(D)  Museums are well supplied with examples of such artifacts.
(E)   Such artifacts frequently exceed in quality those already catalogued in museum collections


从文中,Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong.


可看出,并不是每个articraft都有potential scientific value,这如何可以推出Such artifacts seldom have scientific value.呢?


还请NN指点一二!!!





再加上30-31行的内容推出such artifact seldom have scientific value.
16#
发表于 2005-10-3 15:39:00 | 只看该作者

"(B)   Such artifacts seldom have scientific value.这个选项为什么不选?


seldom表示否定的意思。作者并没有完全否定相似artifacts的作用。

17#
发表于 2006-1-3 17:29:00 | 只看该作者

(20) You might object that professionals excavate to




acquire knowledge, not money.


请教这句话的结构,是that引导的宾语从句吗?动词不定式to acquire前面省略了do吗?这句话的结构我觉得好奇怪。


谢谢!

18#
发表于 2006-8-9 03:43:00 | 只看该作者

25) artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply,

everything that comes our of the ground has scientific

value. Here we part company. Theoretically, you may be

correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scien-

tific value. Practically, you are wrong.

上面划线部分是什么意思?

“company” is a verb here?

请指教,谢谢!!

19#
发表于 2006-8-9 09:13:00 | 只看该作者
part company
 If two people part company, they end their relationship
20#
发表于 2006-8-9 21:04:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢!没有想到是part成为动词
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-26 13:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部