ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs described?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2462|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助,GWD-TN-12,T-4-Q2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2012-6-13 14:06:47 | 显示全部楼层
讲讲我的理解:
Yet后是关键:现在surface coal/coal的the average reclamation cost 下降为过去的一半,问原因?
Yet前说明了coal的分母不变因为技术没有变,地方还是Balzania这个地方,唯一能变的就只有分子上的surface coal变少才能使得整个分式减少,也就是C,仅供参考!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-11 04:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部