【每日逻辑练习第二季】【3-7】

cyndichiang

精练题：3‘07’‘
成功掉进陷阱里。。
J:premise: what guitar should sound like has not general basis
  conclusion: modifying the design of guitars are of no value
M: premise:the improvement it makes in tonal quality
   conclusion: Torres design for guitars to be almost universally adopted
A) Mark’s argument shows how a weakness in
Jane’s argument can be overcome.------M does not show the weakness
(B) Mark’s argument has a premise in common
with Jane’s argument.-------Shell game.no premise is in common,结论对于的问题是同一个设计吉他是否有价值
(C) Mark and Jane use similar techniques to argue
for different conclusions.--------“Mark and Jane use different techniques to argue for similar conclusions.”
(D) Mark’s argument restates Jane’s argument in
other terms.------do not restate her premise; in contrast, he undermines her premise
(E) Mark’s argument and Jane’s argument are
based on conflicting suppositions.-------correct
the premise that he uses contradicts Jane’s premises. If you simply accept “What’s more” to mean that he is in complete agreement with Jane, you will most certainly miss the question
J 认为没有基本的准则去判断吉他的好坏
M 认为实际上是有方法去判断的            premise不同，但是what’ more，表示M同意J 的结论但是不同意他的premise