ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2407|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

我也找不到答案的题 NN们帮忙看一下

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-12 09:32:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
10.

In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy domestic demand.Teruvia’s total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably.Teruvia’s population, however, will be increasing significantly for years to come.Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon have to begin importing rice.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?



A.No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in Teruvia.(我选的答案)



B.Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the cultivation of rice.



C.None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.



D.There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not increase.



E.Other than rice, there are no major crops for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

我也不知道这个题的正确答案是什么 NN们帮我看一下 到底选什么
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-12 10:04:47 | 只看该作者
The answer is A.

For C, irrelevant.  It's the total yields of rice that counts and the stimulus already says that the total yields of rice would not increase appreciably. If it is already stated, it is not an assumption.

For D, it just strengthens the original claim that the total population will increase.  Since we already know this trend, it is not an assumption.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-27 03:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部