[求助]问一道GWD上的题

zxygtx

因为我用的GWD版本和CD上流传的不一样，所以对不上题号。所以在这里发个问题问下。谢谢大家先~~

Q12:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

 

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

 

1. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
2. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
3. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
4. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
5. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

这题答案是E, 看不大明白。它是不是想说：因为irradiated food要么是生吃，所以不用担心VB损失问题，要么是既要irradiated,又要cooked,所以单独探讨irradiated 和cooked谁损失的多是misleading的。是这样的吗？

zxygtx

还有一道，嘿嘿~~

Q38:

Unprecedented industrial growth in the country of Remo has created serious environmental problems because factories there lack adequate pollution-control systems.  Remo is developing a clean growth plan that includes environmental regulations that will require the installation of such systems.  Since no companies in Remo currently produce pollution-control systems, the plan, if implemented, will create significant opportunities for foreign exporters to market pollution-control systems.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

1. The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control devices.
2. Foreign exporters would provide factory-trained technicians to maintain the pollution-control systems sold to Remo.
3. Industrial lobbyists sponsored by local businesses in Remo are trying to prevent the implementation of the government regulations.
4. The regulations that Remo plans to implement are much less strict than those in neighboring nations.
5. Pollution in Remo has caused serious health problems for workers, contributing to a significant increase in the number of workdays lost to illness.

这个题答案给的是A，可是我觉得是C。题目中不是说“no companies in Remo currently produce pollution-control systems”了嘛？那就意味着肯定是要有foreign exporters趁机先卖这种pollution-control systems，占领市场的呀。而C，如果能阻止the implementation of the government regulations的话，不是从根本上解决问题了吗？

fogwind

以下是引用zxygtx在2009-2-23 18:32:00的发言：

因为我用的GWD版本和CD上流传的不一样，所以对不上题号。所以在这里发个问题问下。谢谢大家先~~

Q12:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

 

 

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

 

 

1. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
2. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
3. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
4. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
5. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

这题答案是E, 看不大明白。它是不是想说：因为irradiated food要么是生吃，所以不用担心VB损失问题，要么是既要irradiated,又要cooked,所以单独探讨irradiated 和cooked谁损失的多是misleading的。是这样的吗？

 http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=77366

fogwind

以下是引用zxygtx在2009-2-23 18:46:00的发言：

还有一道，嘿嘿~~

Q38:

Unprecedented industrial growth in the country of Remo has created serious environmental problems because factories there lack adequate pollution-control systems.  Remo is developing a clean growth plan that includes environmental regulations that will require the installation of such systems.  Since no companies in Remo currently produce pollution-control systems, the plan, if implemented, will create significant opportunities for foreign exporters to market pollution-control systems.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

• a.The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control devices.
• b.Foreign exporters would provide factory-trained technicians to maintain the pollution-control systems sold to Remo.
• c.Industrial lobbyists sponsored by local businesses in Remo are trying to prevent the implementation of the government regulations.
• d.The regulations that Remo plans to implement are much less strict than those in neighboring nations.
• e.Pollution in Remo has caused serious health problems for workers, contributing to a significant increase in the number of workdays lost to illness.

这个题答案给的是A，可是我觉得是C。题目中不是说“no companies in Remo currently produce pollution-control systems”了嘛？那就意味着肯定是要有foreign exporters趁机先卖这种pollution-control systems，占领市场的呀。而C，如果能阻止the implementation of the government regulations的话，不是从根本上解决问题了吗？

are trying to prevent the implementation of the government regulations. 是尝试说服阻止，并没有说就阻止了啊。

zxygtx

fogwind大侠，非常感谢你的耐心解答。真的非常非常感谢~~无以为报，只能以加倍努力，好好学习来回报你了。