求问抗生素那到逻辑!请指导下~-->carolhide转移

baggiojia

The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a seven-day course of antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where these drugs are prescribed. A new antibiotic requires only a three-day course of treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where the new antibiotic is prescribed than in cases where either penicillin or erythromycin is prescribed.

 

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

 

1. Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to the new antibiotic.

2. A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a course of treatment with either penicillin or erythromycin.

3. The new antibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial infections other than strep.

4. Some physicians have already begun to prescribe the new antibiotic instead of penicillin or erythromycin for the treatment of some strep infections

5. Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days.

E选项中,无论那种药,病人三天内就康复了.这个如何支持论点, 新药再感染的案例会比青霉素那些少啊??

大家帮忙看看.

感谢啊!

baggiojia

傻傻地问下,斑竹"转移" 是什么意思?

你指转移也能加强嘛?

jdmg

surpport the premise: patiences do stop applying the prescription after 3 days.

if it doesn't happen, it will be no need to develop new drug, coz the patiences abey what physicians demand

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-6 2:25:07编辑过]

gonghao

以下是引用baggiojia在2006-8-5 22:25:00的发言：

傻傻地问下,斑竹"转移" 是什么意思?

你指转移也能加强嘛?

你把逻辑题放在了语法区，被语法区的斑斑转移到了逻辑区

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

老药，治疗周期7天－－－病人3天停药－－－未治愈－－－再次感染

新药，治疗周期3天－－－病人3天挺药－－－已治愈－－－无感染

baggiojia

以下是引用gonghao在2006-8-6 10:30:00的发言：

以下是引用baggiojia在2006-8-5 22:25:00的发言：

傻傻地问下,斑竹"转移" 是什么意思?

你指转移也能加强嘛?

你把逻辑题放在了语法区，被语法区的斑斑转移到了逻辑区

－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－

老药，治疗周期7天－－－病人3天停药－－－未治愈－－－再次感染

新药，治疗周期3天－－－病人3天挺药－－－已治愈－－－无感染

哦, 我说呢.怎么转移也可以支持啊? 以为是新题型.呵呵~~

我明白他的line of reasoning, 但是E是说不管吃什么药, 3天就好了啊(包括那些吃老药的)!并没有突出新药的功效啊! 怎么支持啊?!!

jdmg 说的好像有点道理. 但是偶怎么还是觉得推理不顺啊?

gonghao

E：Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days.

E就是我说的逻辑链里的“病人3天停药”

即不管是什么情况，新药还是老药，病人都喜欢3天内停药。

这样题目里说的，老药：病人吃三天药就感染－－因为他们停药了；新药：病人吃三天没感染－－－因为疗程正好是3天，停药的时候，病人已经康复了，所以没有感染。

新药和老药，都是吃3天就停药了，所以会出现上面所说的情况

zimerman

明白了 是加强前提

baggiojia

感谢耐心解答！

原来加强前提也可以加强论点～

gonghao

以下是引用baggiojia在2006-8-7 14:50:00的发言：

感谢耐心解答！

原来加强前提也可以加强论点～

加强是加强的结论，E结合题目中给出的条件一起是可以加强结论的