本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2012-CR-36 (HNIH)

00:00:00

A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations ataxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individualswould no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions wouldhave to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

AWithout the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
BMoney contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
CThe primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
DWealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
EIncome tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.

正确答案: A

请教lawyer的assumption取非的问题

[复制链接]

lawyer_1

楼主

发表于 2006-5-24 19:40:00 | 显示全部楼层

202题答案E要用radically的原因是原文说了 several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat。如果不用radically，也可以是答案，但不够严密。你的理解陷入了MUST BE的陷阱，的确不陷入MUST BE的陷阱需要时间去体会。所谓的支持削弱，其本质就是说服力的增大和减少。整个GMAT的逻辑都在考说服性的问题，不是在考绝对性，世界上没有绝对的事情。

195题是范围的问题。因为政策影响的只是因为政策才捐钱的人，不影响不管何情况下都捐钱的人。B说的是前者，故是答案。D说的是后者，扩大了范围，故不是答案。