[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day3

鸡麦特焖焖

1

鸡麦特焖焖

day3
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

P：实验中，cement houses 在c/h方面可以generate more cost savings 比起wood的
C：现实生活中，cement houses generate得比实验中更多

思路：范围差
加强：现实中在除了c/h之外有更多generate cost savings的方面。

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

方案：使用有学生签名和头像的信用卡来代替现金

目的：减少贼

will not work：1.员工脸盲

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

环境学家：ban俩东西可以促进旅游业
two states的情况：ban俩东西旅游业更垮了

why：什么东西在two states会让ban之后旅游业更垮
A无关
B 中间因素