一道逻辑题求解 prep07

monica928

Mourdet Winery:  Danville Winery's new wine was introduced to compete with our most popular wine, which is sold in a distinctive tall, black bottle.  Danville uses a similar bottle.  Thus, it is likely that many customers intending to buy our wine will mistakenly buy theirs instead.

Danville Winery:  Not so.  The two bottles can be readily distinguished:  the label on ours, but not on theirs, is gold colored.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines Danville Winery's response?

(A) Gold is the background color on the label of many of the wines produced by Danville Winery.
(B) When the bottles are viewed side by side, Danville Winery's bottle  is perceptibly taller than Mourdet Winery's.
(C) Danville Winery, unlike Mourdet Winery, displays its wine's label prominently in advertisements .
(D) It is common for occasional purchasers to buy a bottle of wine on the basis of a general impression of the most obvious feature  of the bottle.
(E) Many popular wines are sold in bottles  of a standard design.

根据题意，DW和MW的酒瓶子基本一样，就是DW的多了个金标
结论是：两个酒瓶子可以区分，因为DW的多了个金标
那weaken就应该是：两个酒瓶子不能区分
我始终看不出来A怎么错了。因为背景是金色的，所以有了金标以后就看不出来了，这个为什么不行，我觉得挺能削弱的啊~？
我这样想对么？

D究竟是什么意思？

sanlingjie

这里的A是无关的，Danville Winery 的酒瓶包装背景色是否金色与此题无关。D的中文意思是：极为普遍的是，非常客在购买酒的时候一般是根据对酒瓶上最显著的特点的大致印象来购买酒的。潜在意思是，Danville Winery提出的他们的商标是金色这一点并非显著特点，而最显著的特点应当是“distinctive tall, black bottle”。商标的颜色相对于酒瓶的形状和颜色而言没那么显著。所以我会选D。

HerringtonD

DW的逻辑是 因为标不一样，所以这两种瓶子是可以区分的

A中说的金色背景色，否定了DW论断中的前提（标不一样），没有否定论断的推理过程
（而且，背景色是金色，没法说明整个标就被gold colored了——背景和前景明显可以不一样）

D的意思是说，消费者只会粗粗看瓶子，不会看仔细标签是怎么样的
直接削弱了整个因果的推理过程

因此选D更好

monica928

是啊。。。谢谢。。。懂了呢 原来是没看懂意思

monica928

现在想想  D中bottle的意思就只代表瓶子，不包括瓶子上别的特征~~~比如标签
是我弄混淆了