ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Brochure: Help conserve our city's water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner's yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3469|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 逻辑一题求助!!!感谢感谢!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-10 09:28:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Brochure:  Help conserve our city’s water supply.  By converting the landscaping in your yard toa water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.  A water-conserving landscape is natural andattractive, and it also saves you money.
Criticism:  For most people with yards, the savings fromconverting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of newlandscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollarson a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
Whichof the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of thecriticism? (是削弱criticism的说法,还是问criticism怎么削弱brochure的?)
  1. Even     homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can     conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
  • A     conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on     fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
  • A     significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that     do not have yards.
  • It     costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put     in conventional landscaping.
  • Some     homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all     other purposes combined.
    答案说是B,这题是怎么个逻辑啊?


    哎,做GWD好慌啊,思维越加混乱,信心越加被打击。还有10来天考试,紧张哇!!!怎么办呐?


    十分感谢!!

  • 收藏收藏 收藏收藏
    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2012-4-10 09:29:13 | 只看该作者
    Brochure:  Help conserve our city’s water supply.  By converting the landscaping in your yard toa water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor wateruse.  A water-conserving landscape isnatural and attractive, and it also saves you money.
    Criticism:  For most people with yards, the savings from converting to awater-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, sincetypically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’syearly water bills.
    Which of the following, if true,provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?
    1. Even     homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can     conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
  • A     conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on     fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
  • A     significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that     do not have yards.
  • It     costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put     in conventional landscaping.
  • Some     homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all     other purposes combined.
  • 板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2012-4-10 09:30:18 | 只看该作者
    Brochure:  Help conserve our city’s water supply.  By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.  A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.
    Criticism:  For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
    Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?
    A.Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
    B.A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
    C.A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
    D.It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
    E.Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.
    地板
    发表于 2012-4-10 09:42:24 | 只看该作者
    Brochure的观点:省钱;
    Criticism的观点:不能省钱;
    问:哪一个最能削弱Criticism的观点,所以选项中能够证明新的water-conserving landscape的确能省钱就可以了,
    只有B能推出:B的意思说:传统的设施在灌溉和除草方面要花费更多的钱(所以换了新的设施自然在这部分把钱省下来了)
    5#
     楼主| 发表于 2012-4-10 11:38:32 | 只看该作者
    6#
    发表于 2012-4-10 16:02:41 | 只看该作者
    迟了一点,我也说说自己的理解吧。
    Brochure是让大家装节水的,不但节水还能省水钱
    Criticism是说装新的花的钱比节约的水钱多多了;
    问的是那个能够反驳Criticism的观点。
    B说的是新的不但节水,还能节约用在肥料和杀虫剂上的钱。是划算的。
    其他的选项都不能反映出新的设备能省钱这点。
    7#
    发表于 2013-8-17 15:49:05 | 只看该作者
    ls解释的非常清晰准确,谢谢
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-5 22:38
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部