GWD-8-Q14

xn8510

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A.These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

B.Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C.Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D.Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.

E.Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

正确答案是E，但是我觉得应该是D。求高人帮忙具体分析一下为什么D错，E对？谢谢啦~~~~

naoyixue

因为他的结论是建立在since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites， 其实就是要证明那些不加"s“得特别的酒不会让人有反映，那么就E, D不是建立在这个原因上的。

xn8510

因为他的结论是建立在since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites， 其实就是要证明那些不加"s“得特别的酒不会让人有反映，那么就E, D不是建立在这个原因上的。

-- by 会员 naoyixue (2012/3/29 17:28:04)

谢谢！我明白了！看来，还是要仔细看结论啊~~~