People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts' conclusion?
复习了三个月,包括一个月的新东方 750人品大爆发 感谢CD 小鸡 逻辑 碰到一两道好像是GWD的原题 1 People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts’ conclusion? A. A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation. B. A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home C. The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small. D. Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos. E. Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care. 嗯,其实之前我也有想过lucy说的这个问题,但系再又觉得动物管理员不会有多少吧,而普通人群中与动物有亲密接触的人这个基数其实是很大的,即使加入了几个动物管理员对比例应该不会产生什么影响吧。。。 偶认为这个underestimate是相对的,并不说这个survey是不准的意思,只是就目前的情况而论,的确存在一些有过敏症的动物管理员已经离职而没有算到survey里面,所以才会认为这个比例应该更高一点才贴近普通人群的实际比例。 同意,动物园的30%其实低估了,因为动物园员工由于一些人受不了过敏需要换工作,大量新员工需要补充,这使得动物园的过敏员工比例可以维持在30%的低水平
还有一道不记得了 一道摄影的那个 选E好像 JJ上的思路最后一道逻辑讲选举和COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING 有很大的关系。第一句话说虽然受调查的人们表示她们不会因为广告,影响投票。但是POLITICS在结票前还是会大量的散布(AIR什么的,意思大概是漫空飞)COMMERCIAL 广告。因此广告还是对选举有影响,忘记问ASSUMPTION还是加强了... 一个选项是人们投选票根据POLITICS 的CHARATER,而不是PARTY. 最后一个选项是人们会投给经济实力更强的POLITICS 选了前面一个好像。 33题之后一道BF 很明了的 好像是第一个行为是作者defend的但是有人criticize,第二个是evaluation还不知道是conclusion支持作者的defend 语法有一个选项前面是was 后面是had been beforeXXX,还有一个是have been后面是was before xxx,纠结了很久。还考了比较 一道题选了A the increase was 还有一个选项是XXX increase多少多少,但是楼主觉得xxx和increase重复了 一道 XXX(斜体著作),名词.... 其他选项有xxx,which 果断选了前者 一道and and ,前面一个and 是连接名词(一种方法好像),后一个and 是连接非名词(也是一种方法) 倒数一两题 应该是高分题库 但是是平行对称结构诶竟然~ 语法感觉主要是基础的主谓,平行,比较。 有一道of...for...和for...of ...搞来搞去,楼主选的是题目中靠前面一点的选项。忘记动词是什么了...哎 再想想