ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4360|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-CR-28真心求教

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-20 23:29:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请哪位帮忙翻译并清理一下逻辑关系, 实在不理解。先谢谢了。
553

8.6 Critical Reasoning Answer Explanations

28. The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying

to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore,

innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of

competition in bicycle races.

Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance

competition bicycles expands.

(B) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations

developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major

manufacturing concerns.

(C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially

recognized as standard for purposes of competition.(KEY)

(D) The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to

manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.

(E) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about

innovative bicycle design.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-5-21 02:02:05 | 只看该作者
Premise:
1) Innovation in bike is limited by consumer demand.
2) The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers.

Conclusion:
Innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.

Logic chains:
1) Innovation in bike --> limited by consumer demand (A --> B)
2) Consumers who demand and pay for innovations --> bike racers (B--> C)
3) Innovation in bike --> limited by standard set by authorities for bike races (A --> D)

If you connect the dots, the assumption has to be C --> D, which is "Bike racers --> standard set by authorities for bike races."

Now check all the answer choices for the one that is the closest to C --> D.

C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.

C) fits the bill.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-21 03:57:34 | 只看该作者
受教了, 谢谢。

头像上的小朋友很cute哦!
地板
发表于 2011-5-21 16:11:54 | 只看该作者
厉害
5#
发表于 2011-6-15 21:04:54 | 只看该作者
为什么我做题的时候总结不出逻辑链来呢?哪位高手路过可以指点下么?
6#
发表于 2011-6-16 15:21:53 | 只看该作者
2楼太厉害了。真心佩服。
7#
发表于 2011-12-4 23:09:27 | 只看该作者
非常佩服!
8#
发表于 2012-3-12 12:55:30 | 只看该作者
MARK
9#
发表于 2012-3-15 03:28:09 | 只看该作者
受教
10#
发表于 2012-8-8 15:19:05 | 只看该作者
Premise:
1) Innovation in bike is limited by consumer demand.
2) The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers.

Conclusion:
Innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.

Logic chains:
1) Innovation in bike --> limited by consumer demand (A --> B)
2) Consumers who demand and pay for innovations --> bike racers (B--> C)
3) Innovation in bike --> limited by standard set by authorities for bike races (A --> D)

If you connect the dots, the assumption has to be C --> D, which is "Bike racers --> standard set by authorities for bike races."

Now check all the answer choices for the one that is the closest to C --> D.

C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.

C) fits the bill.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/5/21 2:02:05)

不知道这种方法能不能在其他ASSUMPTION题上推广??
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 07:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部