古老PREP-28

hebelong

Hutonian Government Official:Federal law requires truck drivers to take a long break after driving for ten hours, but truck drivers frequently do not comply.Since the public rest areas along our highways cannot accommodate all the drivers needing a break, we plan to build more rest areas to increase the rate of compliance.

Hutonian Business Representative:But if the parking lots around our businesses are considered, there are more than enough parking places.

Which of the following, if true about Hutonia, would provide a reason for persisting with the government official's plan despite the objection?

(A) Public parking areas are evenly distributed along the highways.

(B) Truck drivers are most likely not to comply with the federal law if the total time required for a trip exceeds ten hours by less than an hour.

(C) In comparison to public rest areas, private parking lots near highways tend to be time-consuming for drivers to reach.

(D) Even when rest areas are available, some truck drivers park in places, such as highway access ramps, where their trucks are likely to cause accidents.

(E) Some public parking areas, particularly those on heavily traveled roads, are substantially larger than others.

OA IS C, 我纠结在CD中，如何比较选择？谢谢你们的帮助~

sdcar2010

We are looking for a strengthener. D is a weakener instead. C is the right choice.

hebelong

We are looking for a strengthener. D is a weakener instead. C is the right choice.

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/5/18 19:36:25)

Even when rest areas are available, some truck drivers park the dangerous places, so even building more rest areas is useless. is it?

狂威雪

题目的因果关系是，因为沿高速路的公共休息区少不能提供所有的司机休息，所以要建更多的服务区来提供遵守规则的比例。重在提高比率
加强这个结论。结合因果关系，有另一个原因支持这个结论建服务区的好处，正如C答案，私人的休息区离高速路进，节省时间，车辆方便行进。愿意去休息。提高了比率
D答案当有休息的地方时，一些卡车司机停在危险的地方，能导致车祸。不能加强结论。也不是削弱项，因为有SOME，只是个别的情况不能说明整体。是无关选项。

hebelong

C答案，私人的休息区离高速路进，节省时间，车辆方便行进。愿意去休息。提高了比率

-- by 会员 狂威雪 (2011/5/19 0:41:57)

搞错了吧？？？私人休息区更TIME-CONSUMING 哦