不明白不明白就是不明白

Outsider1988

OG12   114  不会不会还是不会，看了足足有十分钟，还是不会，会的同学给解释下吧

114. Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in
      other structures, such as houses and stores.

(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not signifi cantly different in quality from
     the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and
     be demolished.

(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined signifi cantly since 1930.

答案是D
实在看不出跟题有啥关系啊
难道1930后的carpenters不懂好质量能保证building不disuse吗？？？？？？
既然30前的都知道，那30后的会不懂这个道理吗？
太扯了吧

还是我理解有误？？？

请nn帮解答

kennu_r

非NN

原文由1930年之前建的酒店质量比之后建的酒店质量好——>1930年前的建筑技艺更高超

A。in  other structures, such as houses and stores. 无关
B。 accommodate more guests  关系不大
C 建筑材料没变，无效果
D正确，建筑技艺与建筑材料是能否建成质量好的酒店的2个条件，如果以前的材料用得更好，那不就可以削弱文中观点了吗？
E 加强

Outsider1988

非NN

原文由1930年之前建的酒店质量比之后建的酒店质量好——>1930年前的建筑技艺更高超

A。in  other structures, such as houses and stores. 无关
B。 accommodate more guests  关系不大
C 建筑材料没变，无效果
D正确，建筑技艺与建筑材料是能否建成质量好的酒店的2个条件，如果以前的材料用得更好，那不就可以削弱文中观点了吗？
E 加强

-- by 会员 kennu_r (2010/5/23 22:52:34)

貌似懂点了，原来D也是说材料

谢啦！

你就是我眼里的NN

jiangliu

not NN, and dont agree with kennu_r.

i guess first thing is to find the argument. If you change "Clearly" to "because", you will find the argument/conclusion is "1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward".

So to weaken this argument, you need to find premise that against it:

A. out of scope
B. out of scope
C. strong, not weaken
D. since hotels with better qualities are most likely to be saved, so it waken the argument that carpenter's superior ability is the only factor to it
E. out of scope

within the given premises, i can't find 建筑技艺与建筑材料是能否建成质量好的酒店的2个条件, so i think this explanation is incorrect.

Outsider1988

not NN, and dont agree with kennu_r.

i guess first thing is to find the argument. If you change "Clearly" to "because", you will find the argument/conclusion is "1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward".

So to weaken this argument, you need to find premise that against it:

A. out of scope
B. out of scope
C. strong, not weaken
D. since hotels with better qualities are most likely to be saved, so it waken the argument that carpenter's superior ability is the only factor to it
E. out of scope

within the given premises, i can't find 建筑技艺与建筑材料是能否建成质量好的酒店的2个条件, so i think this explanation is incorrect.

-- by 会员 Jiangliu(2010/5/24 15:16:43)

被你一说我又开始犯晕了，
照你的说法，30前的的carpenters建造时是知道好质量的building会被被saved,那没理由30后的的carpenters不懂这个道理啊，还是他们不想save buildings, or我想的太多了？

Jiangliu小朋友，你知道我在说啥吗？

jiangliu

"30后的的carpenters不懂这个道理啊", 这个。。。貌似是你的推理，题里没有给阿 ：）

Outsider1988

可是题目不是要反驳30前跟30后的质量差别不是skill, care, and effort 造成的吗？
如果D成立，那不就意味着30前跟其后的主要差别就是对质量能够ensure它不被disuse吗？


其实我也不是很清楚我在说什么

好混乱啊

。。。


烦烦烦烦烦烦烦烦啊

lafuria

晕,这帮人都在怎么解释啊～D的意思是：30年代以前的家具只有质量过硬的才会保留到现在，质量不好的都在历史的长河中随风而是了。所以现在看到的30年代以前的家具都是质量非常好的那一部分

m313739540

好像OG 解释的是D说的是质量好的留下了，质量不好的都毁了。。。
你只拿质量好的作比较，而你要比较的是全部。。。所以说D是不具有代表性的。。。

Outsider1988

晕,这帮人都在怎么解释啊～D的意思是：30年代以前的家具只有质量过硬的才会保留到现在，质量不好的都在历史的长河中随风而是了。所以现在看到的30年代以前的家具都是质量非常好的那一部分

-- by 会员 lafuria (2010/5/25 10:56:15)

嗯，懂了懂了，它就是拿30前的好的跟30后的的全部的做对比了，谢啦！