ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1508|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-1-2

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-21 05:23:32 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provision of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.


The author's method of attacking the charges of certain opponents of the new deficit-reduction law is to
(A) attack the character of the opponents rather than their claim
(B) imply an analogy between the law and some New Deal programs
(C) point out that the opponents' reasoning leads to an absurd conclusion
(D) show that the opponents' reasoning leads to an absurd conclusion
(E) show that the New Deal also called for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget


此题我选的是C,正确答案为B
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-12-21 09:42:52 | 只看该作者
这题答案应该是B
New Deal programs有些缺点(unconstitutional),但是却pulled this country out of great economic troubles
the new deficit-reduction law也有些缺点(ndiscriminate cuts in the federal budget),这是可以被justified
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-22 02:02:41 | 只看该作者
弄明白了~谢谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 06:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部