求救OG CR一道题，真的快傻了Public-sector (government-owned) companies are often unprofitabl

Berniel

157. Public-sector (government-owned) companies are often unprofitable and a drain on the taxpayer. Such enterprises should be sold to the private sector, where competition will force them either to be efficient and profitable or else to close. Which of the following, if true, identifies a flaw in the policy proposed above? A. The revenue gained from the sale of public-sector companies is likely to be negligible compared to the cost of maintaining them. B. By buying a public-sector company and then closing the company and selling its assets, a buyer can often make a profit. C. The services provided by many public-sector companies must be made available to citizens, even when a price that covers costs cannot be charged. D. Some unprofitable private-sector companies have become profitable after being taken over by the government to prevent their closing. E. The costs of environmental protection, contributions to social programs, and job-safety measures are the same in the public and private sectors. 这题答案是C 但是我认为C 并没有weak这个policy 就像一个人说把public company卖给private company可以更efficient 但是C说public company的业务是inefficient，这怎么来weak？

Berniel

除非你题目跟我说让业务变efficient的方式就是关闭不盈利的业务，然后C说不盈利也不能关闭，那我就可以认为C weaken了这个policy，但是原文好像并没有这样说

nfihhh

我是这么理解得。
前提：国企不盈利。vs. 结论：国企应该被卖掉。
逻辑漏洞：不盈利 = 要被卖（没有存在的意义）？
C攻击了这个漏洞。国企还有其他存在的意义，不是只为了盈利。

或者不按照前提结论，就只看计划。 计划是：把国企卖给私企，利用竞争提高国企的利润。
C也攻击了这个计划的有效性。国企必须提供一些基础服务给公民，即使是不赚钱的。这样的话不管卖给谁，他都不赚钱。计划达不到目的。