求助 大全上的一道难题

lisiberry

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.

OA B

不知道为什么选B？ 如果有大神明白，请指点一下。
十分感谢。

lisiberry

顶

RRZZR

你是不是看成support题了？这题是must be true 题

b可以由But over time, the subjective element disappears. 和When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, we can objectively call them great.推导出来。

lisiberry

RRZZR 发表于 2017-2-27 07:03
你是不是看成support题了？这题是must be true 题

b可以由But over time, the subjective element disappe ...

明白了

谢谢，正要跟你探讨时发现自己把主观客观的单词记错了。导致完全把题看反了。

错的词在这里写3遍
subjective 主观
objective 客观
subjective 主观
objective 客观
subjective 主观
objective 客观