天山-9-40

anniya

明白了。。。

理解错。。。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-17 20:13:52编辑过]

caterpillarcn

35题感觉答案是B啊。D用refute太强烈点了吧，recent scholars并没有完全反对前人的观点啊，只是在某些部分有分歧而已。

elvislg2003

35: the primary purpose of this passage is to :

D: summarize a scholar refutation of an argument regarding teh development of capitalism in the United States.

Actually, I picked the wrong answer A. However, after reading carefully, I think D is better than any other one.

My reason is that: the whole passage focuses upon presenting a point of view that laisse-faire capitalism was accepted with some struggle. The author used the other point of view with which to contrast  this one.  

Jackie2005

Could someone post the question 35 and the answer? I do not have it.

Thanks a lot!!!谢谢谢谢谢

Novena

1。此题为Q35-37 请楼主修改标题

2。指出楼主理解上一个偏差 supported by mercantilis 不等于 support the capitalism

norms that imposed moral constraints on acquisitiveness 与 Buttressed by mercantilist notions that government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity 其实是一致的，或者说都是一个理论体系下的 （读到这里先把这句话体会一下）

而与Laissez-faire capitalism 相clash 的就是这套理论，所以没有paradox

3。softening the harsh edges of laissez-faire capitalism. 在我看来是一种。。。把不可具像的事物具体化（晕，我乱掰）

意思就是说使laissez-faire capitalism的界限被soft了，没有规定得那么死，那么不可compromise，就是那种感觉，楼主体会一下，偶表达不好

如有错误，请指正！

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-13 19:30:40编辑过]

xionghuixh

40
Q35 to Q37:
For many years, historians thought
that the development of capitalism had not
faced serious challenges in the United
Line States. Writing in the early twentieth cen-
(5) tury, Progressive historians sympathized
with the battles waged by farmers and
small producers against large capitalists
in the late nineteenth century, but they did
not question the widespread acceptance
(10) of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism
throughout American history. Similarly,
Louis Hartz, who sometimes disagreed
with the Progressives, argued that Amer-
icans accepted laissez-faire capitalism
(15) without challenge because they lacked
a feudal, precapitalist past. Recently,
however, some scholars have argued
that even though laissez-faire became
the prevailing ethos in nineteen-century
(20) America, it was not accepted without
struggle. Laissez-faire capitalism, they
suggest, clashed with existing religious
and communitarian norms that imposed
moral constraints on acquisitiveness to
(25) protect the weak from the predatory, the
strong from corruption, and the entire cul-
ture from materialist excess. Buttressed
by mercantilist notions that government
should be both regulator and promoter
(30) of economic activity, these norms per-
sisted long after the American Revolution
helped unleash the economic forces that
produced capitalism. These scholars
argue that even in the late nineteenth
(35) century, with the government’s role in
the economy considerably diminished,
laissez-faire had not triumphed com-
pletely. Hard times continued to revive
popular demands for regulating busi-
(40) ness and softening the harsh edges of
laissez-faire capitalism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

my puzzle:please look the following sentence first:

Laissez-faire capitalism, they
suggest, clashed with existing religious
and communitarian norms that imposed
moral constraints on acquisitiveness to
(25) protect the weak from the predatory, the
strong from corruption, and the entire cul-
ture from materialist excess.

Buttressed
by mercantilist notions that government
should be both regulator and promoter
(30) of economic activity, these norms per-
sisted long after the American Revolution
helped unleash the economic forces that
produced capitalism.

the former"the communitarian norms"clashs with the capitalism.

why "these norms"is also supported by mercantilist(support the capitalism)

in addition, what the meaning of the word' harsh edges' is

I think there is paradoxical ?????
Q35:
The primary purpose of the passage is to