ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1332|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

练习中的一道CR,查证后是LSAT的原题,一起来看看吧

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-6-26 23:28:00 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
The significance of Monet’s work is reflected in a recent discussion of art more than it was in his own descriptions. He is, usually, considered a founding member of French impressionists. Thus, his descriptions are unlikely to do more than confirm what he thought to be true.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a questionable technique used in the argument?


A. It cites two pieces of evidence, each of which is both questionable and unverifiable, and uses this evidence to support its conclusions.
B. It uses the descriptions from a famous artist to support its conclusions.
C. It attempts to establish the validity of a claim, which is otherwise unsupported, by denying the truth of the opposite of that claim.
D. It bases a conclusion on two premises that contradict each other and minimize this contradiction by the vagueness of the terms employed.
E. It draws conclusions about the merit of a position from evidence about the position’s source.
选E,我就剩了AE,我很low,不晓得E是什么意思T^T
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
发表于 2014-6-28 19:13:07 | 只看该作者
E的意思是因为他是印象派的所以他的描述就必须符合印象派别的画家对自己作品的“描述”,即他的描述只能确定他所认为是对的东西。position指代印象派。
A显然不对two pieces of evidence, each of which is both questionable and unverifiable.第一句描述的是一个事实显然不是questionable and unverifiable。
沙发
发表于 2014-6-28 15:05:50 | 只看该作者
不建议做LAST题
出题思路和GMAT有些微的差别
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-25 23:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部