回忆点狗，各位节日快乐，最后感受

非游客

差一点啊！！！问题是我感觉做的非常好，甚至做一半verbal就开始有点放松了……

放点狗
个人考前只看了阅读和数学

还是作为论坛习惯隐藏一下吧


阅读：
文章全中，不过题目就2道相同，不难

1、买一送一那个（JJ上不全）问了三个题，有一个很绕，一个细节题，一个题是jj上提过的，就是比喻XXX，我选用车接人

2、ss那个题第一个出现，问的与JJ上的问法都不相同
有提到姐姐M的信在文中起到什么作用。
说到关于女性的18世纪的描述，except题，选项有一个他们通过一些正式 formal way参加政治和有影响力的事情。我选的这个
还有feminist historian 和 literal historian他们的研究有什么共同点。
此题选项很麻烦，我选的是他们都去研究女性政治什么什么的，其中有一个谈方法相同的肯定不对，有一个谈scott姐妹俩的生活的肯定不对。还有2个中选一个，具体不记得了，大家现场看看

3、地月系那个题，与JJ上只有一题相同，选择月球的相对SIZE。然后高亮了最后一整段问作用……个人选的是“因为数据有限，所以XXXX”

数学：
中了大概一半题，大家还是要自己验算一下，不要秒选，我有一个题目点了YES的时候发现条件改了……
有那个bond纸啊什么什么的，反正都不难，好好看看JJ
只有一个DS题有点问题，有x大于2小于3，问X的取值
但条件2算出来是大于1小于2。我认为不充分，不知道对不对。
反正估计就因为这两个题目导致只有50

逻辑：
我刚刚连忙下载了本月逻辑，看了一下，大概有3个题目是相同的。是修自行车道那个题目（题目变体了，问的与之不同），一个是飞机上放东西，还有一个是，剩下的全部是新的没有的。可我头晕脑胀想不起来了……而且说实话，变化好多……最后连续三个逻辑题我都瞎选的……
只记得有一个题目是说 brodcast 的一个作品《世界大战》对经济社会的影响，说人相信火星人会攻击地球的那个……
整体是读题难，选项觉着不难…我觉着做的不错，除了那三个题，应该都选的没啥问题

作文：
开三个店铺那个题目。没看JJ，但题目很简单，攻击点很多。

ir:
没看JJ，只有5分，有一个题目是CO2的溶解导致PH上升，这里超级遗憾，策略不对，看这个题目得花了快10分钟，导致最后3题全部瞎选……大家平时还是得练一下ir的节奏…

语法：
个人感觉中规中矩，不过也可能是我太早进入低分库了？
不出意外，有2、3个考语义的而非语法点，有2个考both and的平行，还有2个题目出现了GIVEN THAT。最变态的是有几个其他相同，但考了AT、TO的用法


为什么我觉着整体做的不错还中阅读最后却考的这么惨……考

经过一天的折腾现在已经冷静下来了……事实就是事实没办法。
这是最难过的时候，也是依然没有人陪伴和倾诉的时候，这样的时光虽然让人低落，不过生活总要走下去。
即便深夜辗转反侧，明天太阳照常升起。
希望坚持到最后的能有等待的7
继续前进吧，我们还在路上。

茉色天香

aaaaaaaaaa

shanmin2002

Thanx a ton

suosssss

dddddddddddddd

李学子

！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

珊若小花

！！！！！！！！！！！！！

格林康

dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

堕落蕾蕾

Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida
Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent
neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious,
then, that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more
expensive than a similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case
several years ago. So, it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are
now overpriced relative to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in
our financial interest to purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in
Sandida Heights.”
1 city 不同, s 升值空间大 2 commercial real estate price , retail price 3, expensive- overpriced
, the author’s solution rests on the assumption that A is sufficient to give birth to the desired goals.
The author reaches the conclusion that it is better to purchase a retail space in Palm Grove instead of in Sandida Heights. The author cites following evidence in support of his conclusion. First, the author points out that the commercial property prices have been increasing a lot in Sandida Heights compared to that in Palm Grove. In addition, the author reasons that a retail space in Sandida Heights is far more expensive than a similar one in Palm Grove. What is more, the author also assumes that the retail spaces in Sandida Heights are highly overpriced. The argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion. A thorough examination shows that the argument is problematic because of several critical flaws discussed below.
    First, the author simplistically assumes that there are no relevant differences between Sandida Heights and Palm Grove, and thus the situation of Palm Grove can easily be applied to Sandida Heights. However, the author asserts this on a misleading comparison and ignores the major differences between Sandida Heights and Palm Grove. For example, Sandida Heights is a metropolis which attract millions of immigrants every year. On the other hand, Palm Grove might be a undeveloped city. Therefore, such an analogy, as cited by the author, is highly doubtful without considering that Sandida Heights and Palm Grove are actually dissimilar.
    Second, even if the author can compare the price of retail space between these two cities, the argument relies on an additional argument, which renders it unconvincing. The author illogically depends on gratuitous assumption that because commercial property price are highly expensive, the retail space prices are also expensive. However, no evidence is stated in the argument in support of this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that the office price of CBD area are too expensive but not the retail space. As a consequence, given this possible scenario, the fact that commercial real estate price is high prove nothing about price of retail space.
    Third, granted that the author justifies all the foregoing assumptions, the argument remains doubtful for the reason that the author's line of reasoning is that retail spaces are overpriced due to the expensive price of commercial real estate price. However, the author bases his conclusion on an oversimplified causal relationship analysis. Very likely, but not necessarily, other potential factors are carelessly or deliberately ignored by the author as possible causes of the expensive price. For example, Sandida Heights has recently built a railyway to connect the city with other part of the country. This is the reason why many companies purchased commercial real estate in the city. Therefore, without considering other contributors in the casual relationship, the author cannot justify his causal analysis in the statement.
     In a nutshell, the argument is severely weakened by the confused logic in its reasoning and the author provides an incomplete analysis of the current situation and, accordingly, offers a questionable suggestion. To better bolster the argument, the author should take all the analysis mentioned above into consideration.  

Emmad3

谢谢楼主~~~

momo0007

撒打发地方