ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4059|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] 一直在路上-killerluo的学习日记-请大家监督~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-27 21:00:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
说真的,不知道应该把这篇文章放在什么地方。因为时隔三年,我又回到了这个地方。

一切只是缘于三天前收拾东西时看到了第10版OG,心血来潮的打开阅读做了两篇,竟然全对了(之前只在答案页作分析时画了两笔)。突然感叹,GMAT这个东西真的是神奇的,确实是考思维和能力的。我只是把重点放在了文章结构和逻辑上,并没有像原来那样逐次逐句的理解文章。不过,语法全忘了,逻辑有些题目读不太懂。现在想想也未必是件坏事。以前的方法如果是错的呢?

还是缘于心血来潮,可能真的是工作之后便没有什么激情了吧。。我上了GMAC的官方网站(也许只是想借此找些事情来刺激一下麻痹的神经)。。发现GMAC孜孜不倦的阐述着GMAT的用意,而对象则是众多大学机构及应聘单位。用意是什么?就是GMAT Advantage and benefit,大家想要看的话可以自己搜索一下,我想,这可能也是增加IR的原因吧。GMAC官网上对于Verbal的各类题目解释也非常的简单,但是详细说明的还是那个Advantage,即各个学校机构或是众多外企考察应聘者的衡量标准,因为GMAT能达到这个公平公正的标准和考察应聘者的能力。

现在也从国外回来了,但是还是很怀念GMAT,还是想重温一下。。因为在职,非常忙,所以每天坚持半小时到1小时吧。。哈哈,请大家监督。。

首先是十一放假期间把Bible解决掉。还是下面分楼每天记录吧。。请大家监督。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
来自 12#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-17 15:14:53 | 只看该作者
2013.10.17

这几天发现很多之前沉了的NN帖(根据内容搜索得来的),觉得CDer真的是人才辈出,尤其是对于SC的理解和攻略显然比前几年有质的飞跃。
我在不断了解的过程中发现了以下资料:

Bible: 看了CR部分,觉得收获不大,不知道是不是后面的练习题出的不好(汗。。一有错题我就觉得是题出错了,或是出偏了)。。
Manhattan:大家的反映出奇的好,也是我下一阶段的材料
Ron's lecture: 听了一个SC,真的是受益匪浅,因为自己的时间很富裕,所以会把lecture听完,然后总结好送给大家。看到CD上有Ron的幻灯截图,但是说实话,不如听课收获大,因为Ron的课上会有很多例句,更容易理解,那些take away可能对大牛们更有用。这个据说要根据Manhattan配合着看。
Prep 08/07: Prep 08 用作补漏,因为大牛们总结的还是有些边框,不如Ron重在分析理解。据说Prep 07里有错误,所以想拿来练Pace.
OG:做了40道题了,真心觉得还得做官方的,自己的思路和答案也差不多,正确率在80%,总是有那么几道题在读题的时候就没看懂。对于SC,句意很重要,看懂的前提下,错误率就会减少。
GWD: 因为Prep中有重复做过的题,所以这个是临考练习Pace的最佳法宝。

所以近期的任务就是把Manhattan根据它的分类列出来,Ron的视频每天看一点,慢慢补充进去。
因为在职,所以还是坚持每天1-2小时(这个是来自Bible的,呵呵)。
来自 13#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-21 22:09:17 | 只看该作者
2013.10.21
为什么写这个呢。。其实上篇就已经明确要看Manhattan SC和Ron's lecture了。。但是偶就是个有些叛逆的小孩。。没看过的资料总想尝试一下。。虽然对Bible已经失望了,但是又看到了Manhattan FoV和Word Smart了。。所以就花了点时间。。
简单评论一下Word Smart 和 Manhattan FoV这两个材料(这个因人而异,只是我的感受啊,大家留情拍砖啊。。)

这几天扫了20多页Manhattan FoV,感觉不是太好,因为讲的太基础了,例如什么是名词,动词,形容词等等,如何使用。。其实看看也无妨,但又是用英语讲的,这就跟用中文讲拼音一样。。不知道我是否表达明白我的感受了。。然后是Word Smart,某个CDer推荐的,感觉对中国人不太实用,一个是说学单词要深究其使用方法,逐词深入分析并记忆(我觉得大家没有这个时间,还不如总结OG了),另外就是方法中有类似中国人学外语标拼音的方法,也就是为了记忆一个外语单词,用另外好几个外语单词的读音去记忆。。

然后转到了大家说的Manhattan SC 5th, 我只能说真的是好东西,刚看了20页就被吸引住了,没有废话,字字都要记下来。我是跟某个NN学的,把不同知识点分类手抄在纸上了,然后打算不断分类补充。觉得知识点还是自己总结的好,然后再不断地更新总结。看了一些NN的资料,真的非常感谢NN们的分享,里面的东西大多都是众多NN们经过自己的理解后不断更新总结出来的。但是,我想说的是,最重要的其实是NN们用的方法,而不是内容,因为NN们大多都会提到自己复习的资料。NN们用自己的表达方式或理解总结出来的东西,或许并不能使所有人全部吸收理解。所以,NN的分类题型,或是做表格的方法,倒是应该借鉴,然后就是我们自己向里面填充总结。

说了这么多的废话。。。好几天没说了。。见谅啊。。
所以要从Manhattan SC 5th开始了,今天完成1个section,很听话的把meaning 放到最后再看,虽然还是扫了一眼,哈哈。然后还有1个Ron的视频。
明天继续。。
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-26 15:32:59 | 只看该作者
2013.10.26

这几天一直在看Manhattan SC 5th, 并手抄总结了,比较麻烦的是例句,都觉得很经典。打算先来第一轮,然后第二轮再总结一遍只有知识点的,用OG题目向里面补充。时间比较紧张的同学推荐看equalgirl的版本(排版和总结都称赞),但是一定要看原书,因为有一部分原文解释的更清楚,equalgirl总结的很概括,可能有些同学不能参透其中的意思。

这个周末打算接着做OG,之前做了60题,从50后的10题,我错了一半,然后就果断的放下OG,看Manhattan了。
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-15 22:35:10 | 只看该作者
2013.10.15 (2h)

感觉还是OG上的题做的舒服,看到大家的牛帖上都推荐做曼哈顿,我是打算把OG综合上的语法都做一遍后,总结,然后用曼哈顿补漏,不知可否。

做了21-30 错2题,31-40 错两题,看OG上的解释还是觉得首先要读懂句子内部的逻辑关系,是转折,承接,还是递进,然后就是找到句子的主语和谓语,再看修饰是用ing分词还是ed分词。

OG-SC-23 句子的逻辑结构为前后对比(转折),而不应用ing分词做承接延续前句句意。
OG-SC-26 以前一直认为分号就是句号,要完整的句子,此题完全颠覆了我的想法。。分号仅代表并列,要求各部分一致。
OG-SC-37 我一开始以为joined是本句的谓语,OG上解释是要按照chronological flow走,但是还是觉得解释的模糊。
OG-SC-38 前后两句分别表示不同态度,且同时发生,需要用词一致。其中,admiration for (后跟person), and 和also 同用redundant.

10#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-13 22:42:10 | 只看该作者
2013.10.13 (2h)

在此期间做了Bible的语法,看了相关解释,有些不太理解,觉得Bible上讲的规律很基础,收获不大。。因人而异吧。。
今天我毅然决然的转向OG了,做了20道语法,错了3个,正确的题看了一下解释都和自己想的差不多。错的三道题是OG-SC-9,OG-SC-15,OG-SC-20

第9题,一看见percent还有比较词(than), 就基本晕了。。薄弱环节。。
第15题,把not...but和not only...but also弄混了。。。前者是转折,后者是递进。。但是解释中关于confident修饰households的解释没有看明白,A选项和C选项怎么就没有表现出修饰关系了?
第20题,这道题方向从一开始就错了,我以为是和第9题一样了,但是看了解释才知道是因为expectation而导致的动词形式错误。

觉得看解释的收获在于知道错误的优先顺序(解释错误选项时第一个指出的)和绝对错误是哪些,这个很重要,需要不断总结。

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-8 22:01:33 | 只看该作者
2013.10.8 (2h)
做了几道语法题,很不得要领,决定还是先看大家的总结,然后再做题总结。我看的是Tonytong的个人语法笔记。把like的部分看了,后面的练习题总结了。
在itunes上看到一下关于GMAT的视频,挺好的,GMATPrep Now,对于刚接触的同学们有些帮助。

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-6 17:52:51 | 只看该作者
2013.10.6 (1.5h)
今天看到一个强帖,收获很大,http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-543843-1-1.html  
语法,首先第一条是语法基础必不可少,其次是语法题其实是考逻辑,是要求最高的一项,语法中的逻辑是关键,第三是千万不要只看划线句。
复习资料:
·       曼哈顿的SC、CR和RC就是三本语文部分
·       GWD/TN24套
·       做了模考笔记,也看了无数遍
·       数学部分:陈向东的数学
逻辑部分,我总结一下:
1.    读懂段落,多半就会做。
2.    熟悉题型,随着问题找读题的重点,
3.    达到标准的方法是突然发现lawyer经典的帖子字字珠玑。四大经典题型是假设、支持、削弱和找主题。

另一个强帖:
打算调整一下步调,觉得应该从语法上开始,因为阅读能力和单词是基础,在语法方面可以总结出来。接下来的计划是Bible/Mahattan/OG/Prep08.07

Bible: 语法的选项A/B/C/D/E有可能是平均分配的。最难的语法题是选项都是读起来不顺的,但是要选最好的。下面是 hierarchy of errors:
Category 1: Technical grammar rules 铁定错的
These include most of what the following chapters discuss: incorrect verb tense,subject/verb disagreement, misplaced modifiers, lists that don’t use parallelconstruction, comparisons that don’t compare like things, and incorrect pronounusage. These are the sorts of things that show up in grammar books.
When you find an error that falls into one of these categories, it is wrong. There’s noambiguity--a choice thatbreaks one of these fundamental grammar rules will never be right.
Category 2: Idioms and Mood 与第一条比有可能对
Part ofthe problem with idioms, as I alluded to in the previous chapter, is that thereis almost an infinite number of idioms in English. Some of them, such as therule that determines using "less" and "fewer," areunambiguous. Many more of them, like the hundreds of guidelines that pair verbsand prepositions ("concernedwith," "concerned for," "concerned about") are notnearly as clear. In the Idioms chapter below, you’ll find the unambiguous ones. Thosegenerally belong in Category 1. However, everything else belongs here. If youthink you’ve found an obscure idiom problem, you might be right...or the testmight be using another obscure idiom that you aren’t familiar with.
The otherissue in this category is the passive mood, or as it is more commonly known,"passive voice." In general terms, a sentence uses passive voice whenthe object precedes the subject. ("John was complimented by Kim" is passive,while "Kim complimented John" is active.) The GMAT prefers active voice. That said,long sentences can be passive without the mood causing many problems, and somesentences are active but are still awkward. Passive voice just isn’t asclear-cut as the technical rules in Category 1.
When you identify an error in Category2, you can probably eliminate the choice, but be careful. A choice with aCategory 2 error will, in rare cases, be correct. Such a choice is correct ifand only if all four of the other choices have Category 1 errors.
Category 3: Clarity (and everything else) 与前两条比有可能对
If youread through the explanations in The Official Guide to GMAT Review, you’ll find frustratingly vague descriptions of grammatical errors. Terms like "clarity of expression," "elegance of expression," and "rhetorical construction" appear again and again.
In general,those terms refer to the efficiency with which a sentence is written.
All else equal, a short sentence is better than a long one. Active voice is one way to achieve that, but sometimes it’s just a matter of rearranging phrases. The
GMATwould prefer that no sentence ever be awkward, redundant, inelegant, orunnecessarily long. However, lots of correct SC answers have some of thosecharacteristics. This occurs more often on harder questions and on items wherethe entire sentence is underlined. When you encounter these Category 3 errors, be very careful:
Lots of choices with Category 3 errorsend up being correct. As with choices that contain Category 2 errors, choiceswith Category 3 errors could be right or wrong. It depends on the otheranswers. A Category 3 choice will probably be wrong more often than it isright, but it can be right—if and only if the other four choices have Category1 and/or Category 2 errors.

错误分为三个category,所以作总结的时候每一个选项按照优先级区分。
下面分别说明:
名词:thedistinction between plural nouns and singular nouns.
代词:When apronoun is used, it should be clear what it refers to.
形容词:基本只修饰名词,GMAT中很少出现大量形容词修饰成分。
动词:后面会提到,很复杂。
副词:基本只修饰动词,可在动词前,也可在动词后。
介词:focuson the precise meaning of these words. E.g. “before” will always be used whencomparing times; “Toward” appears when one thing is moving in the direction ofanother.

在看选项之前,focus on exactly what the words mean, and whether the sentence structure makes sense.在做阅读和逻辑的时候,我们要培养读句子的时候不是只看作者写了什么,而是要思考他要表达什么。然而语法正好相反,我们要找的是句子用词imprecision和nonsensical phrasings.

动词时态:
一般我们有past,present, and future tenses; 我们更要注意的是进行时和完成时。E.g.
"He was writing an essay."
"He is writing an essay."
"He will be writing anessay."
"Before the economy’s recentrecovery, it had had made investors nervous."
"The economy is recovering, but ithas made investors nervous."
"By the time the economy recovers,it will have made investors nervous."


规律:
1. Verbtenses must make logical sense. If the meaning of the sentence indicates theorder in which two events occur, the earlier event must be described using anearlier tense than the later event.
2.Progressive tenses are generally not desirable. Use of a progressive tense isdefinitely a Category 3 error; you will see correct answers using progressivetenses. However, just about any "ing" verbs can be improved, andoften the GMAT gives you a better option.
3. In general, perfect tensescannot be used unless the corresponding simple tense is also present in the sentence.For instance, it wouldn’t be grammatically correct to say, "The economyhad been slumping." The past perfect tense implies that it had beenslumping before some other event occurred. To be correct, the sentence needs to include something in the past tense. For example, "The economy had beenslumping before legislators passed a comprehensive aid package." The eventdescribed using past perfect precedes the event described using simple past.
4. The one exception to theprevious rule is present perfect. It is acceptable to use the present perfectwithout also describing an event using simple present. For instance,"The economy has been slumping" could be correct.
一般来讲,完成时要有前因后果,如使用过去完成时就要有过去时,但是4中讲到,现在完成时是特例,可单独在句中使用。

主谓一致:
一般来说,主语为名词,当然很多情况下会有很多修饰成分。另外,每个句子都要有一个动词,且这个动词要根据主语的单复数形式而定。但需要注意的是动词的形式不是根据临近名词的。GMAT出题时会把主语和动词离得很远来误导我们。

虚拟语气:
1.If a sentenceexpresses a hypothetical, use the verb "were" instead of"was." Forinstance, this is correct: If I were to apply to an MBA program, I might beaccepted.
The keyword is "if," which signals the hypothetical.
2. Mandatingsubjunctive: 用强制性的动词做虚拟语气,如request, demand, command...E.g. "You should finish yourwork." "I think you need to decide."è"I request that you finish your work." "He demanded that thedecision be made."
我们需要注意的是: First, the mandatingsubjunctive applies to any tense. ("Request" is present, while"demanded" is past.) Second, the words "should" and"need" are gone altogether. Requesting and demanding imply that thework should be done and that the decision be made. Finally, note in the secondsentence the use of the word "be." It might feel more natural to write,"He demanded that the decision should be made," but as I’ve pointedout, the word "demanded" implies that it "should" be made.The word "should," then, is redundant.
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-5 21:50:47 | 只看该作者
2013.10.5 (2.5h)
今天发现了一个强帖,学习了一下。

【逻辑入门】(一)Arguments
每个句子包括前提、连接词、结论,但往往在argument中是没有连接词,且需要自己识别哪些是前提,哪些是结论,之间的连接词又应该是什么。
【逻辑入门】(二)More about Argument Components
有时候一个argument中有几个前提和几个结论,要做的是要找到那个总结论,不要被子结论误导。一般的模板应该是这样的:
1)   Opinionof someone else
2) The author’s conclusion(usually introduced with words such as but or however to highlight the contrast)
3) Premise(s) to support the author’s conclusion
Asto examples of such opinions:
Manyscholars believe that . . .
A few committee members argue that . . .
The defendant claimed that . . .
The classical theory holds that . . .
Hui’s recent research found that. . .
Most CDers voted [the posts by Zeros as their favorites]
       It iscommonly assumed that . . .
       It is very documented that . . .
       It is widely agreed that . . .
【逻辑入门】(三)Main Point
在main point问题时,先问自己,作者想要证明什么?结论是什么?一般结论会在结尾,但有的时候也会在段首或段中,结构往往是这样的:
Opinion. However, conclusion. Premise.
Opinion. Although concession, conclusion. Premise.
Look for the answerchoice which most accurately restates the main conclusion you found in thepassage. Possible wrong answers include 1) restating a premise; 2) listing anintermediate conclusion; 3) giving you something, which with a NEW assumption, could be inferred from the passage (thecardinal sin for Must-be-true type questions).
【逻辑入门】(四)Role (Boldface)
Common prompts for role or boldface:
Which one of the following most accuratelydescribes the role played in the argument by the claim that . . .?
The statement that . . . serves which one of the following functions in the argument?
The claim that . . . figures in the economist’s argument in which one of the following ways?
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first boldface statementhas what relationship to thesecond boldface statement?
Before you look at the answers:
这几点讲的太好了~~
1. Pinpoint the mainconclusion in the passage.
2. Separate the premises from everything else.After finding the main conclusion, don’t assume that all the other statements are premises; they might include opposing viewpoints, background information, orconcession.
3. Analyze the structure of the argument. In other words, figure out how thevarious pieces of an argument or a passage fit together logically.
4. Then, in your own words, describe what role the statement mentioned in theprompt plays. Is it the
main conclusion, an intermediate conclusion, a premise, an opposing viewpoint, a view that author is trying to support, aconcession? Avoid looking at the answers until you have forced yourself todescribe the statement’s role.

Then look for the answer
that most accurately describes what you just described:

1. Focus on the active clause of each answer tohelp yourself move through the answers faster.
2. The correct answer must describe
exactly what ishappening in the passage. Make sure every word of that answer correlates with some part of thepassage. In other words, translate the abstract terms into concrete terms fromthe passage. If the statement is the argument’s main conclusion, for example,but the argument also has an intermediate conclusion, then the answer that thestatement “is the author’s only conclusion” would be wrong; it is not the only conclusion, even though it is the main conclusion.



6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-5 21:36:16 | 只看该作者
2013.10.4  (2.5h)
Practice正确率:
Weaken:2对2错  正确率:50%
Explanation: 2对2错  正确率:50%
Evidence: 2对  正确率:100%
Inference: 3对   正确率:100%
Fill-in-the-blank: 2对1错    正确率:66.7%
Boldface: 2错  正确率:0%
有个奇怪的现象,100%区域的题目平均用时1分钟,错的题都是用时多的(2分钟)。

发现个背单词的好东东分享给大家:http://wordpress.lixiaolai.com/archives/8079.html  背了6个unit.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-18 14:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部