ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1965|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

五五波写作贴

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-23 14:15:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
if you needto discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, you willuse e-mail or texting message OR use the telephone or voice-messaging.



In thepresent day, teamwork is majority which means effective communication isinevitable. Although resolving differences on the phone or voice-message can bemore direct, emotional and convenient, I would go for e-mail or texting messageconsidering their efficiency and effectiveness from the following reasons.

First, e-mailand texting message tend to give both sides more private space which make theirdebate less attractive. When it come to a upsetting or controversial problem,people are easily become self-centered, impatient and irritated ignoringreasonable parts of the other side’s viewpoint. So with e-mail or textingmessage, they are able to get access to calmness, full-developed ideaexpressions, careful reviews, and a final agreement. I actually got benefitfrom typed words by my experience.

Once a time,I was made as the captain of a volunteer team serving the celebration of the 60thanniversary of my university. A girl, a member of my team named July, called mesaying she was unsatisfied with her appointment and blamed it on my partialityto my friends. I was totally roiled by almost every her word. Both of us startedto shout at the cellphones defending ourselves and barely listen to each other.At the moment our cooperation is on the verge of breakup, I suddenly realizedwe need to calm down to get out of this mess. So I said goodbye timely and hungup the phone. Maybe I should take parts of responsibilities for a lack of clearannouncement, which was what came to my mind the moment I put down the phone. Itexted her explaining that all work is arranged randomly hardly involving meand her part also had some advantages that would help her make progress. Thegirl’s reply expressed her apology and point out I might misunderstand her insome aspects, which reminded me I was somehow too defensive. Finally, it turnedout we got settled problem and great friendship. Therefore, it is what e-mailor texted message can bring us that the opportunity to review thingsobjectively, concern for others and resolve the predicament.

Second, comparedto telephone or voice message, e-mail or texting message is available to eachsides anytime. They can choose when to send it or when to read it, even spendmore time to think about their words to show their respect and deepconsideration, while do not need to worry about disturbing the other one for differentschedules and making the tense situation worse. Such as I would like to studyin library in the morning quietly, but a voice from phone might totally ruinit, especially from a person I was made at for the same upsetting thing. Iwould rather deal with it in a relaxed mood alone offering me room to thinkover it.

Moreover,within an e-mail or texting message they can add other elements beside words, like a cute icon or a beautiful background relaxing the atmosphere or cheer them up. My sister, Susan is particularly good at this. She was the leader of her mid-term assignment group, but a boy always delayed his parts with various excuses and turned a deaf ear to other members' complaint  leaving them angry. One day, when the boy's work seemed to be stuck again over the deadline, Susan send him a message saying "Can I have your work?" accompanied by a lovely pleading look icon. Shortly the boy handed in his outcome and texted Susan that "So sorry for the delay, especially when you treat me so kindly." Though my sister is upset about him, her message smartly covered it up and made the boy feel warm.

In conclusion, to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others isreally a tough task, with e-mail or texted message is to be better for us tosolve it in an reasonable and intelligent way.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-25 19:59:05 | 只看该作者
9月23日作业

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
5#
发表于 2013-9-25 00:10:30 | 只看该作者
9-23的作业,谢谢批阅呀
http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-873700-4-1.html
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-24 21:11:49 | 只看该作者
北极的企鹅123 发表于 2013-9-24 18:19
改好了,两篇都写的真心特别好,不过我有个疑问,第一篇举例举的很好,不过这么长的部分都在举例会不会影响 ...

恩  我也觉得 下回会注意控制  谢谢~
板凳
发表于 2013-9-24 18:19:53 | 只看该作者
改好了,两篇都写的真心特别好,不过我有个疑问,第一篇举例举的很好,不过这么长的部分都在举例会不会影响分数啊

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-23 16:22:48 | 只看该作者

tpo17 integrated writing

The reading and the lecture both discuss humanimpact to bird population. The reading passage gives credence to the claim thathuman activities damage bird population; meanwhile, the professor provide evidencescontrary to this hypothesis.

The author of the passage mentions humansettlement expansion endangers birds’ wild habitats causing bird’s populationdecline. The professor, however, disputes that urban development has been badfor some birds’ population shrivel, but also provides better and largersettlements for other birds allowing their population growth. She also guessesthat these increased birds can be extra prey for other birds that have not beenexpected to be seen in urban.

The next viewpoint made by the reading isthat human population growth must lead to increased agricultural land take theplace of more bird habitats. Contrary to that, the professor assumes that thisincrease would not happen in a way as soon as declaimed by the reading. Accordingto her, land area used for agriculture drop every year with higher output whichis result from more productive variety of crops. So we can produce more food ineach unit land without destroying more wild in necessary.

Moreover, to counter the presumption fromthe reading that chemical pesticides use will add as human settlement and agricultureincreasing which is to harm bird population, the professor mentions two changesoccurred when people aware of the possibly destructive consequence of traditionalpesticide . One is new and much more nontoxic pesticides are developed. Theother one is the growing trend to develop more pest-resistant crops which isgenetically modified and is unattractive to pest, so less hurt to birds due toless chemical pesticides use.

In conclusion, the reading strongly asserts that bird population will serious decline on account of human population,agriculture and pesticide use enhance; nevertheless, the professor argues thatnone of these evidence provided is convincing and gives her own proofs.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-1 05:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部