CR Bible 疑似错误...求高水准验证！

KingsDi · 发表于 2013-9-19 15:59:29

各位有看过CR Bible的朋友过来围观一下~

这个里面讲了unless的用法，然后再这道题里面... 我觉得LC应该划斜线，因为unless的用法说了：1unless后面的作为必要条件，2其他部分否定之后作为充分条件。那么，they will lose the case就应该否定一下咯！也就是不会lose the case了，不是这样么？

求助求助！

题目： Unless they find an eyewitness and put the defendant on the stand, they will lose the case.
LC = lose the case
FE = find eyewitness
DS = put the defendant on the stand

KingsDi · 发表于 2013-9-21 11:35:25

sdcar2010 发表于 2013-9-19 20:09
You are right. The explanation is wrong.

There is no need to draw such graph. It should become auto ...

Thanks a lot!

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2013-9-19 20:09:37

You are right. The explanation is wrong.

There is no need to draw such graph. It should become automatic for any test taker to know the premise/conclusion when encountering an "unless" clause . . . just like what LZ did.

KingsDi · 发表于 2013-9-19 16:01:10

第一幅图是题目，第二幅图是原则！怪我没说清楚~~~

CR Bible 疑似错误...求高水准验证！

本帖子中包含更多资源

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()