求高人指点！一道关于因果类型逻辑题目的疑问

ssyy-mail

Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?
A Company P manufactures products that are more hazardous for workers to produce than does CompanyO.
B Company P holds more safety inspections than does Company O.
C Company P maintains a more modern infirmary than does Company O.
D Company O paid more for new job-related medical claims than did Company P.
E Company P provides more types of health-care benefits than does Company O.

这个题目我觉得是因果类型的题目而不是相关因果。因为O公司比P公司的去年事故更少，所以推出O公司的事故率更低。A的答案完全是抛弃了这个题目的因，从另一个方面来证明果是对的。但是B答案我理解的意思是，即使P公司的安全规则更多，但是他的事故却多，所以正好可以推出P公司更容易出事故。所以我觉得B是正确答案。但是给出的正确答案是A。高人能帮我说说我的思路错在哪里？谢谢！

joyang_1

我看逻辑都是看原文提到的东西有没有和选项有关。
这个原文最重要的一句话是“Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P”，那么也就是说答案一定要解释为什么O会有fewer "job-related" accidents。选项B Company P holds more safety inspections than does Company O 只能是一个政策，它没有解释也不能成为O有fewer job-related accidents的原因，因此选项A更准确！
回答的有点晚了，也是我的潜见，希望能有所帮助！

abc791201064

我没有按照LZ的办法 因为我不知道那是HLER还是哪儿的方法 helr的方法我研究了半个月都咩有研究 就按照你自己的逻辑  B 我感觉不可以support  反而在说反话

A。 说的方向首先是对的  P的产品比较危险  这是一个因素

abc791201064

虽然说CR的答案是选出来的   SC的答案是比出来的 但是如果你5个选项都觉得不好 你总得比一个出来是吧

我做的时候 我觉得五个都不好  因为这个题目其实很容易理解

两个公司人啥的都一样
P：事故量：O小于 P
C：因此：O的人更不容易有事故