2013.06.18. Independent Writing:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Scientists should be responsible for the negative effects of their discoveries.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scientists are respectful to many of us because they always play an important role in improving our daily life. Even though sometimes their discoveries might be abused or lead some negative effects, in my opinion they should not be responsible for that, as discussed below.
First of all, we can judge the statement on the basis of the intrinsic meaning of scientific researches themselves. A Scientific research is a series of activities, through which people are seeking for better understandings of the unknown outer world around us and our inner souls. As a result, it could be impossible for scientists to determine whether the discoveries will result in positive or negative impacts beforehand, let alone taking charge of them. An apt illustration involves Einstein, who is famous for his efforts in putting forward the theory of relativity. Although the theory of relativity has been used in developing atomic bombs, which have killed many ordinary people, it is not Einstein who should be responsible for this catastrophe. As we all know, Einstein strongly rejected to use the theory of relativity in this way but failed to prevent it.
Secondly, scientific discoveries are actually only the explanations or descriptions of the real world and should not be divided into good or evil. So it is the people or organizations who utilize the fruits rather that the scientists who achieve the fruits that should be responsible for the bad influence of scientific discoveries. For instance, the techniques of clone have been polemical for a long time. But I think there is little dispute about the technique itself and what makes people so upset is the way in which the techniques of clone will be used. I believe that the governments and legislatures ought to play a more important role than scientists in preventing the potential negative effects. Furthermore, if scientists are always worried about the possible problems which their discoveries could arouse, they might have no chance to make any breakthrough in their meaningful researches.
In sum, scientific discoveries as well as the scientists who achieve them are candid. And it is the people who use the scientific discoveries in an evil way that should be responsible for the negative effects. Fortunately, we could prevent the abuse of scientific discoveries by legislations or regulations in our modern society. |