求问 OG13 CR62

MsL

我选了C, 这道题看了解释也不明白

62. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,
they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are
dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

IrvingHan

M猫Fishoo 发表于 2013-2-27 13:40
一开始实验矛盾的地方在如果是聋子应该听不见问题。如果听的见问题那就不是聋子，不是聋子为什么还说我听不 ...

同意！               

seeingyou

就是类似：
“有人在家吗？” “没人。“
和
”你睡了吗？“ ”睡了。“

rockorange

做了两遍都觉得是神一样的题目orz 第二个同学解释的很好！

Jojolalala

懂了，一开始很在意the part replies，我理解成单纯的说话回应。聋的部分：听不见，所以不回答。回应的部分：说明能听见，那应该要回答“我不聋”，但是实验对象回答“no”

elaineyoung

膜拜大神…… 果然还是词汇量的问题…

成成儿

edifier1990 发表于 2013-7-28 17:42
是的，如果说两部分是分离的话，那么应该回答“yes”，也就是hearing的部分再起作用，deaf部分没有起作用； ...

觉得这个解释靠谱~~~谢谢edifier1990，好帅的照片，赞一个

alexzeze

沙发楼解释得好赞 感谢！！！

berylzhang

原来这题传说中的lawyer解释过

wywyvivian

简直是神题啊！！！太难了！！！玩智商啊！！！