ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4716

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5150|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13 CR89提问

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-31 12:10:55 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
89. Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
(B) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.
(C) The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
(E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish

一直搞不懂这道题的conclusion是什么,个人总觉得是overoptimistic,但是看了解释,貌似完全错了,选的答案也和正确答案刚好相反。求指教
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
14#
发表于 2016-12-6 15:23:41 | 只看该作者
头疼
13#
发表于 2015-8-15 17:23:38 | 只看该作者
这道题目我的理解是,第一句和第二句之间明显有转折的意思,而DE并没有体现这种相反的方向。

关于D,这个explanation 指的是对最开始那句,It has been known that高级主管买公司股份这个现象的解释,我们不能理解成高级主管买股份是因为他们被知道They have been known...他们买股份有个什么目的,而应该直接是他们因为要分散谣言。

我反而觉得E更有可能。不过OG说作者并没有要解释现象,只是想削弱Deposits的推理,这个从main conclusion是 deposits 的reason overoptimic也可以看出来。
12#
发表于 2015-7-29 14:05:02 | 只看该作者
还是觉得可以是第二句可以是 explanation TUT 晕死了这个题
11#
发表于 2015-7-26 12:20:00 | 只看该作者
EnglandManu 发表于 2013-7-7 21:53
想再请教下D选项中关于BF2的部分,“the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to esta ...

个人愚见:其实我觉得D选项的第二句的表述不正确。the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.   尤其是后面这个定语从句,that the argument seeks to establish,意思是argument seeks to establish the explanation, argument肯定不是为了establish一个解释,而应该而是establish一个conclusion或者一个position。同见OG13 CR76的正确选项D,the first and second each provide evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks to establish.
所以个人觉得,若是把原选项改为the second gives the explanation to support the conclusion that the argument seeks to establish.就应该可以
10#
发表于 2014-10-5 14:19:29 | 只看该作者
求NN解答 顶一下
9#
发表于 2013-9-20 16:40:19 | 只看该作者
EnglandManu 发表于 2013-7-7 21:53
想再请教下D选项中关于BF2的部分,“the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to esta ...

我个人也是这个逻辑,但是我觉得会不会是段一解释的The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain. 这是一个小的结论(rumor is false)的解释,不是作者整篇文章都在讨论的conclusion(overoptimistic).
8#
发表于 2013-7-21 15:14:18 | 只看该作者
EnglandManu 发表于 2013-7-7 21:53
想再请教下D选项中关于BF2的部分,“the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to esta ...

顶一下,D项我也是这个逻辑,排除不掉,求NN解释下~ 谢谢
7#
发表于 2013-7-7 21:53:03 | 只看该作者
1369179610 发表于 2013-1-31 19:59
先说一句,楼主你认为论述的结论是overoptimistic 是没有错的。题意理解:前提1:       &n ...

想再请教下D选项中关于BF2的部分,“the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.”首先,the arguement seeks to establish的其实就是conclusion,即overoptimistic,而BF确实是对其的解释啊,为什么overoptimistic呢,是因为bankers是故意用购买公司股票的形式来打消公众的疑虑。所以我觉得D选项没有错啊?
6#
发表于 2013-5-28 17:26:53 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上几位的指点!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-10 07:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部