求助！！！Manhattan 一道逻辑（Strengthen)~各位大虾请赐教

sicilia小山

Scientists suspect that Europa, a moon orbiting Jupiter, may contain living organisms.
However, the government recently scrapped an unmanned science mission
to Europa and replaced it with a project aimed at landing an astronaut on Mars.
Polls show that the public is far more fascinated by space travel than by discovering
life elsewhere in the universe. Critics argue that the government's decisionmaking
process places a greater emphasis on popularity than it does on the
importance of scientific research.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen a contention by the government
that the new project is a better use of its funds?
(A) In the first year of the project, the government will spend 30% of its total
budget on developing a space shuttle that can travel to Mars; that figure is
expected to drop to 0% after five years.
(B) The government cannot be absolutely certain of the chances for success of
either project.
(C) Some scientists are convinced that a mission to Europa would add immeasurably
to our understanding of the universe.
(D) A new telescope that has just become available to scientists promises to
yield more information than the planned mission to Europa was designed to
provide.
(E) Most people feel that a shuttle to Mars is the next logical step in the development
of a system that will allow humans to travel even further in the solar
system.

KEY
搞不懂telescope与Fund使用better有什么关系，不是在比较Mars登陆计划要比Europa计划好么？
请各位童鞋告诉我为神马～感激不尽～

billkp

uhowoo 发表于 2012-11-14 11:42
Telescope的出现能代替europa计划，所以fund就拿来干别的有用的了，比如mars计划。对比没必要的europa计划 ...

那E是不是错在只说了mars计划的好，但是没有比较？

sicilia小山

Telescope的出现能代替europa计划，所以fund就拿来干别的有用的了，比如mars计划。对比没必要的europa计划，mars计划是better use of its fund.

-- by 会员 uhowoo (2012/11/14 11:42:00)

啊～噔～明白了！！！telescope 可以拿来观测就不用europa计划咯！没思考到这个共通之处呢～太谢谢了～这位童鞋～AHA

uhowoo

Telescope的出现能代替europa计划，所以fund就拿来干别的有用的了，比如mars计划。对比没必要的europa计划，mars计划是better use of its fund.