Only a reduction of 10 percent in the number of scheduled flights using Greentown's airport will allow the delays that are so common there to be avoided. Hevelia airstrip, 40 miles away, would, if upgraded and expanded, be an attractive alternative for fully 20 percent of the passengers using Greentown airport. Nevertheless, experts reject the claim that turning Hevelia into a full-service airport would end the chronic delays at Greentown.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify experts' position?
我觉得你说的有道理 但og的解释说Airlines generally use certain airports as regional hubs--an airport through which an airline routes most of its traffic...我的理解是因为这里是中心,很多航线在这里,机场要是不让一些航班经过就会使得航空公司routes不畅,所以不能减少G机场的航班。请问我这样理解的对吗?
我的思路是这样的啊,仅供参考 reduce 10% number of flights in G -----> avoid delays Hevelia upgrade -----> reduce 20% passengers in G 就看passenger 和 flights number的关系了
A. Highway construction - 无关 B. 另一个跑道比H还好 - 无关比较 C. 没justify D. airline cost - 无关 E. 大多数航空公司的航班passengers在G这个机场转机,所以不会减少number of flights,那就避免不了延误