prep07 一道逻辑题看不懂 求教~~~

monica928

Treatment for hypertension  forestalls  certain medical expenses by preventing  strokes and heart disease.  Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population.  Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

(A)  The many fatal strokes and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.
(B)  The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.
(C)  In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.
(D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly .
(E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

谁能把这个题目翻译一下 我肿么看不懂，谢谢啦~~~

HarrisZheng

治疗高血压可以避免中风和心脏疾病，从而避免治疗这些疾病的医疗费用。但这些所规避的费用只有治疗高血压的1/4。（简单来说，就是预防比治疗费钱）。结论就是，治疗高血压经济上不合理。