TOPIC: ISSUE45 - "Government officialsshould rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carrying out thewill of the people whom they serve." WORDS: 491 TIME: 00:38:00 DATE: 2012/9/11 23:55:48 提纲：主体偏中立 1。人民选择过多难统一，且很多难以判定是否出于本能而非理性 2。人民民主是自由社会的标志，人民幸福是政治的最高要求，政府官员很难注意到基层需求 3。需综合考虑 不可偏向任何一方 As the society develops rapidly, peoplegradually pay more attention on the individual rights and the accomplishment ofpersonal will. This calls into numerous questions no matter for the governmentofficials, or for the every citizen with independent democratic rights. Themajor controversy lies in whether the government officials should rely on theirown judgment rather than unquestioningly carrying out the will of the peoplethey serve. Nevertheless, it is hard to determine that either should thedecision be made based on.
It makes some sense that it cannot beeasily accorded of the argument from the citizens, stemming from that the willmight be likely to be made for abundant reasons. Even if the will of the peopleare accorded, how could the government officials guarantee that it is derivedfrom rationality rather than single human nature? However, none of thequestions could be answered if the officials simple base their judgment andfollowing decision on the will of the people.
In contrast, as democracy develops fast inour contemporary society and begins to play an increasingly essential role atpresent, it is critical to make decisions after taking into consideration ofpeople's will. In addition, it might be difficult to comprehend the essence ofwhat the people exactly want in their lives. It is, to a large extent, a resultof the subjectivity of the leaders concerning that the officials fails to knowcertain details of what people's lives are like. For example, the request ofmedical insurance in some worker families is just for a resolution to keephealth of the whole family as normal people do, which is some details that theleaders seldom have the chances of realization. Last but not the least, it isthe happiness and welfare of the people that the civil politics are pursuing,which again strengthens the importance of the people's will.
It might be biased to simple decide thegovernment officials should rely on their own judgment or carry out the will ofthe people. Instead, both of the two sides should be taken into accountgenerally when it comes to decide the base of the judgment the government ismaking. On the one hand, it is arbitrary to implement some policiesunconditionally without discussing with the public. On the other hand, oneadvantage the government owns is that it has the authority and ability tocomprehend the problem as a whole, which contributes a lot to solving theissues. Things would be solved in a much rational way if combine the twoaspects together.
Even if what should the judgment thegovernment is considering still awaits further discussion, we already recognizethe advantages and disadvantages of either sides. It is never wise to simplyconsider the views with absolute agreement or abnegation. Only by generallycomprehend the issues and discuss the question from various angles could thegovernment weaken the disadvantages and could the advantages benefit thegeneral public.
accorded of the argument？ 说两个问题，你的三个分论点，没有层次感，各自为战，不太好 提纲中的第二点前面的部分和最后一句感觉是两个点。 再就是你的抽象说理太多，不够specific 想跟你讨论一个问题，比如，如果一个话题谈及竞争与合作，如果我只说竞争有竞争的好处，合作有合作的好处，然后说我们需要把竞争和合作结合起来，但没有深入的说在什么情况下合作能有好处，而竞争又在什么情况下有好处，最后也不说该怎么结合竞争与合作，这种写法是不是很普遍因而档次不会很高呢
accorded of the argument？ 说两个问题，你的三个分论点，没有层次感，各自为战，不太好 提纲中的第二点前面的部分和最后一句感觉是两个点。 再就是你的抽象说理太多，不够specific 想跟你讨论一个问题，比如，如果一个话题谈及竞争与合作，如果我只说竞争有竞争的好处，合作有合作的好处，然后说我们需要把竞争和合作结合起来，但没有深入的说在什么情况下合作能有好处，而竞争又在什么情况下有好处，最后也不说该怎么结合竞争与合作，这种写法是不是很普遍因而档次不会很高呢
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-9-12 00:12:20
收藏
收藏
楼主
