求解GWD上的一道CR题 不太明白 望解答

zxtwillima

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances.  A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”  The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A.Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B.In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C.The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D.There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E.The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

zxtwillima

万分感谢～～～

gorgeous

刚才找到了一段解释，支持B的，你可以参考一下：

在宣传时工人的做法是ask only：你支持全州禁烟吗。选民对这句口号的反应是：要全州全面禁烟啦。至于原文的最后一句话是说明这些工人实际想禁烟的地方，并没有在宣传中讲。这本身就已造成一个circulated misleading。它实质上是为B作铺垫。选项B的circumstances和原文的最后一句话说明该计划的全州禁烟作用很小。而选民的期望肯定认为要全州全面禁烟，且有不小的作用。如果选民认为该计划的真相是指部分禁烟且在rual作用是很少的，会支持他们吗。在这点上作宣传的工人和选民的认识是不同的(误解误导：misleading)

gorgeous

我选C，但貌似选错了，答案有争议，集中在B和E

我的理解就是这群petition advocators就是在蒙voters，让他们以为这个Petition和现在的local ordinance差不多的。所以答案我就找能说明这个新的Petition和local ordinance有明显差异的