为什么这个逻辑是错的

女王的肥皂

Driver: My friends say I will one day have an accident because I drive my sports car recklessly. But I have done some research, and apparently minivans and larger sedans have very low accident rates compared to sports cars. So trading my sports car in for a minivan would lower my risk of having an accident.
The reasoning in the driver's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that this argument
(A) infers a cause from a mere correlation
(B) relies on a sample that is too narrow
(C) misinterprets evidence that a result is likely as evidence that the result is certain
(D) mistakes a condition sufficient for bringing about a result for a condition necessary for doing so
(E) relies on a source that is probably not well-informed
Look at this argument: I drive car reckless, so I will have an accident one day.
Minivans have low accident rates compared to sports cars.
Conclusion: minivans will lower my risk of having an accident.
Still again, I think I can infer this conclusion based on the information provided.

女王的肥皂

嗯

fiq5659613

我觉得Minivan和large senda事故率低的原因可能是他们的司机经过特殊的培训，不会drive recklessly。所以错误在于misinterprets evidence

女王的肥皂

不是呀，我觉得论述说的是 A--> B ,
但是没有强调 只有A -->B

上邪

because it ignores other possibilities
the conclusion means changing the car to big ones is the only way to avoid car crash...
狒狒上好像有蛮多这种题的 额
什么因为天热 所以大家都用吃雪糕降温 所以只要吃雪糕就能降温
因为吃A药能让大家不生病 所以只要吃药都能不生病
…………0 0