高手请进，求解一道《白勇逻辑》题

Johnsonjz

The average age and racing experience of the drivers at the Indianapolis 500 automobile race increased each year between 1965 and 1980. The reason for the increase is that high-speed racing drivers were living longer than their predecessors. Race-car safety features that reduced the severity of crashes of the kind that took drivers' lives were primarily responsible for the increase in the average age of the Indianapolis 500 competitors.Which of the following, if true, would be most likely to be part of the evidence used to show that safety measures on the cars that protected drivers in major crushes were responsible for the increase in the average age of drivers at Indianapolis race?
（A）Younger drivers at high-speed were involved in major accidents at a slightly higher rate than were old drivers between 1965 and 1980.
（B）Major accidents on high-speed race tracks occurred at about the same frequency in the year after 1965 as in the year before 1965.
（C）The average age of drivers attempting to qualify for the Indianapolis 500 decreased slightly between 1965 and 1980.
（D）Accidents on highways in the United States occurred at about the same frequency in the year after 1965 as in the year before 1965.
（E）Other safety features, involving the condition of the racetrack and the uniforms worn by the drivers while driving, were adopted at                     Indianapolis between 1965 and 1980.
正确答案是B，其他四个是无关选项，但是看不出B对在哪里，请高手指点！

woaiwongfaye15

这道题,我也不知道为什么选B,但是如果按照逻辑排除的话,那就只剩下B选项了....其它4个都无关

sasha_wen

请楼主将自己在逻辑专区提问的方式改成题目出处在标题的方式，方便后来的童鞋搜索，谢谢配合！

Johnsonjz

懂了，谢谢

bloombergable

题干说 evidence: 选手年龄在1965年后增加了，原因是选手们比前辈活的久了
premise:车子安全性能的提高是选手们长命百岁的主要原因

问：这个premise有啥证据吗？

B说： 1965年前后的在比赛中的大型事故发生率是一样的  推==》 大型事故率一样，有证据表明65年以后选手们活的久，所以65年之前的大型事故死亡率很高，65年之后的大型事故致死率低 ==》 是安全性能起到了作用啊！

The reason for the increase is that high-speed racing drivers were living longer than their predecessors.

这句话要把它当作evidence, 不是premise

sdcar2010

B) is a necessary assumption for the question.

If death rate is down, it could be that the safety features were better or the number of accidents were LOWER.

Johnsonjz

求解释啊！